About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 Transnat'l Hum. Rts. Rev. 1 (2014)

handle is hein.journals/tranhurrv1 and id is 1 raw text is: 
   BALANCING, PROPORTIONALITY, AND HUMAN
      RIGHTS ADJUDICATION IN COMPARATIVE
            CONTEXT: LESSONS FOR NIGERIA

                                By

                       Basil  Ugochukwu*
At-roduction
  kfit is the nature of  the role that courts perform   when   they
evaluate  human rights complaints? Answering this question
engages   two  related but  contending  values  in the  process  of
protecting human   rights through  judicial means.  The first value
is that persons  are entitled to certain rights and freedoms   that
are  either completely   outside  the  controlling  power   of  the
state, organizations  and  others in the society,  or which  when
they  are  infringed  could  trigger  an  application  for judicial
protection  by  the victims.  The  second  value  is that the state
can impose   limitations on certain rights and  freedoms  but only
if it could justify those limitations by showing how   they further
overriding  public objectives.'  Among   those  objectives may   be

*.   Legal Process Instructor at the Osgoode Hall Law School of York
    University, Toronto, Canada. He received a PhD from the Osgoode Hall
    Law  School, and an LL.M degree in hmnan rights from Central European
    University in Budapest, Hungary in 2008 (under a Fellowship from the
    Open Society Justice Initiative). He is winner of the 20 10 Osgoode Hall Law
    School Walter Williston Essay Prize in Civil Liberties. He can be reached
    via email - ugochukwubc@yaioo. corn. The author presented an earlier
    version of this article to the second group of the Atlas Agora Doctoral
    Workshops held at Bar [lan University, Tel Aviv, Israel. 1He is grateful to
    Dr. Ittai Bar-Siman Tov who led the discussion and Lisa Kerr, Nicholas
    Leger-Riopel, Yaniv Rozoai, Orly Stern, Sirus Kashefi, Jonathan Kolieb and
    the anonymous reviewer of this journal for their helpful comments. The
    author takes responsibility for all remaining shortcomings.
1.  David Dyzenhaus, Murray  lunt & Michael Taggart: The Principle of
    Legality   in    Administrative  Law:    Internationalization as
    Constitutionalization (2001) 1 OUCLJ 5 at 6 (describing the culture of
    justification as one which obliges decision-makers to justify their decisions
    by showing either how the decisions conform to sore values, including

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most