About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

37 Sydney L. Rev. 1 (2015)

handle is hein.journals/sydney37 and id is 1 raw text is: 






Public Intoxication in NSW:


The Contours of Criminalisation



Luke McNamara* and Julia Quiltert



                                   Abstract

      This article traces the history of the regulation of public intoxication in
      New South Wales (NSW)  from  the early 1800s to the present. We argue that
      although the formal legal status of public drunkenness and drinking has
      changed over time, and although different approaches have been prominent at
      different points in the history of NSW, public intoxication has been consistently
      and continuously criminalised for almost two  centuries, despite official
      'decriminalisation' in 1979. Shifts in regulatory modalities - including offence
      definitions, police powers, the involvement of local councils and enforcement
      practices - have been associated with significant changes in how the nature of
      the problem of public intoxication is conceived and how the persona of the
      'public drunk' is constructed. Perceived at different times as immoral, annoying
      and pitiable, most recently, individuals who are intoxicated in public are
      increasingly seen as 'dangerous' and as posing a risk to other members of the
      community. The threat to public safety and the fear that innocent members of
      the public might be subjected to random violence have become major drivers of
      policymaking and law reform in this area, and have produced a less forgiving
      and more punitive approach to public intoxication.

I      Introduction

In recent years, the problem of 'alcohol-fuelled violence' has been the subject of
intense media  scrutiny, and  the trigger for a number  of  significant changes to
New  South  Wales  (NSW)   criminal laws  and liquor licensing laws.2 Much  of the
attention has focused  on the dangers  posed by  young  men  who,  while drunk  in
public, engage  in random   attacks, sometimes  with  fatal consequences.3 In this
article, we locate  these contemporary   debates  and  legal developments   in the



   Professor, School  of  Law,   University of  Wollongong,  Wollongong,  Australia.
   Email: lukem@uow.edu.au.
t   Senior Lecturer, School of Law, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.
   Email: jquilterguow.edu.au.
   See  Julia Quilter, 'One Punch Laws, Mandatory Minimums and Alcohol-Fuelled as an
   Aggravated Factor: Implications for NSW Criminal Law' (2014) 3(1) International Journal for
   Crime, Justice and Social Democracy 81.
2  Lenny Roth, 'Liquor Licensing Restrictions to Address Alcohol-related Violence in NSW: 2008 to
    2014' (Research Paper E-Brief No 4/2014, NSW Parliamentary Research Service, Parliament of
    New South Wales, 2014).
    Julia Quilter, 'Responses to the Death of Thomas Kelly: Taking Populism Seriously' (2013) 24(3)
    Current Issues in Criminal Justice 439; Julia Quilter, 'The Thomas Kelly Case: Why a One
    Punch Law is not the Answer' (2014) 38(1) Criminal Law Journal 16.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most