About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

52 Stetson L. Rev. i (2022-2023)

handle is hein.journals/stet52 and id is 1 raw text is: 




STETSON LAW REVIEW


VOLUME   52                            FALL 2022                             NUMBER   1


OPEN ISSUE


ARTICLES

Honor  The Oath: Florida's Constitution and the Need
for Bar Examiner Reform                                            Keith W. Rizzardi     1

      When  it comes to bar admission, law students who aspire to join the profession can
      justifiably question whether Florida law means what it says. Serious tensions exist
      between  the Rules of the Florida Supreme Court Regulating Admission to the Bar
      and  the other transparency, free speech, privacy and judicial funding requirements
      of the Florida Constitution. The bar examiners have a long-standing, restrictive, and
      regulatory view of themselves as a constitutional safeguard protecting the public
      from  potentially dangerous attorney aspirants, but the Supreme Court of Florida
      cannot and should not exempt its agents from the State Constitution.

      Open   government  initiatives, online announcements, and periodic reports can
      enhance  transparency and  public understanding. Vague character rules can be
      rewritten. Individual freedoms of speech and thought can be respected. Needless
      invasions of personal privacy can be avoided through reevaluation of the financial
      and  mental health inquiries. Burdensome fees can be reduced, and the public at
      large should contribute to the bar admissions budget. Florida's principles of ethics
      and professionalism direct that the voices of the legal community should be heard in
      our effort to self-govern and administer the justice system.

      In most cases, today's bar applicant is tomorrow's lawyer. For these applicants, the
      actions taken by the Florida Board of Bar Examiners create first impressions of the
      entire legal system. A constitutionally-questionable process is not a good beginning.
      The Florida Supreme Court, its bar examiner agents, the members of the Florida Bar,
      the professors and institutions working in legal education - and yes, the future
      members   of the profession - all need to honor our oaths.

Prosecutorial Discretion, Justice, and Compassion:
Reestablishing Balance in Our Legal System                         Anna D. Vaynman
                                                                & Mark R. Fondacaro    31

      The  criminal justice system, wherein nearly all cases are resolved through a guilty
      plea, is tenuously balanced on prosecutorial discretion in the context of the plea-
      bargaining process. This shift in the balance of power away from judges and juries is
      particularly troubling given the lack of formal legal safeguards afforded to defendants
      engaging  in plea bargaining rather than going to trial. The main issue is not
      prosecutorial discretion per se, or even overzealous prosecutors, but the lack of
      oversight of the plea-bargaining process and the imbalance of power itself, which
      threatens the legitimacy and stability of the criminal justice system. This Article
      argues for the importance of prosecutorial discretion as a potentially valuable tool
      and  analyzes how and why it creates potential for abuse. The Article concludes with
      suggestions for recreating a balance of power, by addressing issues arising from
      unequal access to information throughout the plea-bargaining process, recentering a
      defendant's  constitutional rights within the justice system, and implementing
      safeguards in the prosecutorial function prospectively.

The Third Amendment  in 2020                                        Michael L. Smith    55

      This Article is the first in a series of yearly articles analyzing references, discussion,
      and  applications of the Third Amendment in court, legal scholarship, and popular
      media  and commentary. The  Third Amendment's prohibition on quartering soldiers
      in houses during peacetime and its requirement that quartering during times of war
      be authorized by law is not typically discussed (or even known) by most in the legal
      field. This Article and its future iterations aim to address this neglect by surveying


1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most