About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

2008 Stan. Tech. L. Rev. N1 (2008)

handle is hein.journals/stantlr2008 and id is 1 raw text is: 


Caitlin Hall: A Regulatory Proposal for Digital Defamation: Conditioning   230 Safe Harbor on the
Provision of a Site Rating











                                             NOTE


        A Regulatory Proposal for Digital Defamation:

  Conditioning § 230 Safe Harbor on the Provision of a

                                        Site Rating


                                        CAITLIN HALL


                              CITE AS: 2008 STAN. TECH. L. REV. NI



                                        I. INTRODUCTION

    Vhatever lip service we may pay to those spaces immemorially . held in trust for the use of
the public,' the Internet is operatively the most important public forum ever created.2 Its vast
interconnectivity far more nearly approximates the prototypical marketplace of ideas3 than do
warring politicos duking it out on the op-ed pages or, for that matter, in opposing briefs. However,
the very features that make the internet fertile ground for cultural and political discourse-anonymity
and pseudonymity; intellectual symbiosis and parasitism; fractal sprawl, audience dispersal and many-
to-many architecture-render it a treacherous landscape for its custodians. In recognition of that
fact,4 Congress in 1996 passed the Communications Decency Act, which nearly eliminated the
liability that website administrators face for third-party generated content5


      0 2008, Caltin Hall, Yale Law School.
      Hague v. Comm. for Indus. Org., 307 U.S. 496, 515 (1939).
    2 See, e.g., Denver Area Educ. Telecomm Consortium, Inc. v. FCC, 518 U.S. 727, 802-3 (1996) (Kennedy, J., dissenting)
(Minds are not changed in streets and parks as they once were. To an increasing degree, the more significant interchanges of ideas
and shaping of public consciousness occur in mass and electronic media.).
    3 See Abrams v. United States, 250 U.S. 616, 630 (1919) (Holmes, J., dissenting).
    4 Communications Decency Act, 47 U.S.C.   230(a)(3) (1996).
    s The law provides in relevant part:
(c) Protection for Good Samaritan blocking and screening of offensive material
(1) Treatment ofpublsher or speaker
No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or seaker of any information proided by another information
content pronder.
(2) Civil liability
No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be held liable on account of-
(A) any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be
obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is
constitutionally protected; or
(B) any action taken to enable or make available to information content providers or others the technological means to restrict
access to material described in paragraph (1).


Copyright C 2008 Stanford Technology Law Review. A/IPR'ghts Reserved.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most