About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

33 S. African L.J. 427 (1916)
Digest of Cases

handle is hein.journals/soaf33 and id is 447 raw text is: DIGEST OF CASES.-APPELLATE DIVISION.                    427
DIGEST             OF       CASES.
SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA.
APPELLATE            DIVISION.
Appeal.-Special leave.-Natal Native High Court.-South Africa
Act, sec. 11O.-Act 1 of 1911, sec. 1.-Sentence.-Appeol froin.-An ap-
plication made under sec. 1 of Act 1 of 1911 for special leave to appeal
against a judgment or order of the full Native High Court of Natal
can be entertained by a Court consisting of the Chief Justice and two
ordinary Judges of Appeal.   The provisions of sec. 110 of the South
Africa Act that on the hearing of an appeal from a Court consist-
ing of two or more Judges, five Judges of the Appellate Division shall
form a quorum  do not apply to an appeal from the full Native High
Court of Natal, but such an appeal can, under Act 1 of 1911, be heard
by three Judges of the Appellate Division.  Assuming that the Appel-
late Division has power under Act 1 of 1911 to reduce on appeal a
sentence duly passed by the full Native High Court of Appeal, such
power will only be exercised in exceptional cases where the interests
of justice require it.  The decision of the Natal Native High Court
in Rex v. Mdhlongwe and Others confirmed.       (June 7.)   Rex v.
Mdhlongwe and Others.
Appeal.-Special leave.-Upon an application for special leave against
a decision of three Judges of a Provincial Division given on appeal
from an order as to costs made by a resident magistrate upon the
hearing of an appeal made to him under sec. 90 of the Transvaal
Provincial Ordinance 9 of 1912, it appeared that the question raised
was whether the magistrate, in making the order, had acted in an
administrative or in a judicial capacity.  Held, that this question
was of sufficient importance to justify the granting of special leave
to appeal.  (June 17.)    Vereeniging Municipality v. Essop.
Costs.-Taxation.-Appeal cse.-Natal practitioner.- Sooth Africa
Act, sec. 115.-The only consultations for which, in appeal cases, fees
can be charged by counsel are those which take place at the instance
of the attorney and with him or his client.  A legal practitioner en-
titled by the local law of Natal to practise both as an advocate and
attorney is entitled under sec. 115 of the South Africa Act to practice.
and to charge fees in both capacities in the Appellate Division.  On
taxation of a party and party bill of costs in respect of an appeal
case heard in the Appellate Division drawn by a firm of attorneys in
Natal, one of whose partners was senior counsel on appeal, the Taxing
Officer disallowed a fee to senior counsel on consultation and reduced

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most