70 S.M.U. L. Rev. 721 (2017)
Do You Believe in Magic: Self-Determination and Procedural Justice Meet Inequality in Court-Connected Mediation

handle is hein.journals/smulr70 and id is 741 raw text is: 






          Do You BELIEVE IN MAGIC?:
 SELF-DETERMINATION AND PROCEDURAL

   JUSTICE MEET INEQUALITY IN COURT-

               CONNECTED MEDIATION

                           Nancy A. Welsh*


                             ABSTRACT
   Proponents of the contemporary mediation movement  promised  that
parties would be able to exercise self-determination as they participated in
mediation. When  courts began to mandate the use of mediation, commen-
tators raised doubts about the vitality of self-determination. Though these
commentators  also suggested a wide variety of reforms, few of their pro-
posals have gained widespread adoption in the courts.
   Ensuring the procedural justice of mediation represents another means
to ensure self-determination. If mediation provides parties with the oppor-
tunity to exercise voice, helps them demonstrate that they have considered
what each other had to say, and treats them in an even-handed and digni-
fied manner, it is more likely that the parties will share information that
will lead to a result that actually represents the exercise of their self-
determination.
  Recent research, however, counsels that status affects procedural justice
perceptions, voice is not always productive, and parties who are marginal-
ized or lower status may neither expect nor desire to exercise voice. Fur-
ther, research indicates that even those parties in mediation who value
voice may not value participating in the back-and-forth or bargaining pro-
cess that is required to arrive an agreement.
  After reviewing this and other research, the Article proposes the follow-
ing reforms to enhance the likelihood that mediation will provide all parties
with voice, trustworthy consideration and real, substantive self-determina-
tion: increasing the inclusivity of the pool of mediators; training all
mediators to acknowledge and address implicit bias; training mediators to
engage in pre-mediation caucusing that focuses on developing trust; institu-
tionalizing systems for feedback and quality assurance; training mediators
to model reflective listening; adopting online technology that provides par-
ties with pre-mediation information they need to engage in informed deci-

    * Professor of Law, Texas A&M University School of Law. I thank Michael Green
for inviting me to participate in this symposium, Richard Delgado for his inspiration for
the symposium, and Roselle Wissler for her comments on an earlier draft of this Article.
Any error or oversight is mine.


721

What Is HeinOnline?

With comprehensive coverage of government documents and more than 2,400 journals from inception on hundreds of subjects such as political science, criminal justice, and human rights, HeinOnline is an affordable option for colleges and universities. Documents have the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline with pricing starting as low as $29.95

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?