About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

64 S. C. L. Rev. 633 (2012-2013)
Predictive Coding: Emerging Questions and Concerns

handle is hein.journals/sclr64 and id is 667 raw text is: PREDICTIVE CODING: EMERGING QUESTIONS AND CONCERNS Charles Yablon & Nick Landsman-Roos 1. INTRODUCTION .......634 11. PREDICTIVE CODING: THE TECHNICAL PROCESS . .. .... 637 A. TWhat Is Predictive Coding: A General Overview ............................... 637 B. Issues in Implementation .............642 1. How the Seed Set Is Created ..............642 2. W4hether the Seed Set Is Discoverable ...................................... 644 3. The Prediction Score Threshold for Production .............645 4. The Appropriate Confidence Level and Interval . ........... 645 5. W4here Subsequent Manual Review Is Appropriate . .. 646 111. TIE UNFOLDING CASE LAW ........................................647 A. The D a Silva M oore Case...... ..................... .....................647 1. The Predictive Coding Protocol ......... 648 2. Holdings of the Da Silva Moore Opinions .......... .. 651 B. Kleen Products LLC v. Packaging Corp. of America.......................... 656 C. Global Aerospace v. Landow Aviation ...................658 D. In re Actos (Pioglitazone) Products Liability Litigation .. 660 E. EORHB, Inc. v. HOA Holdings LLC ......................661 F. The Unresolved Questions in the Case Law ....... ....................662 IV. PREDICTIVE CODING AND PROPORTIONALITY REVIEW .. ................663 A. The Big Picture: WJ'ho Gets the Benefits ofPredictive Coding? ..........663 B. Responsiveness, Relevance, and Importance....................................... 667 C. Some Fairly Tentative Suggestions ..... .. 670 V. COURT-ORDERED CODING. ............................ ................673 A. Responding Party Seeks to Use Predictive Coding over the Requesting Party's Objection ............. .. 675 B. Requesting Party Seeks a Court Order Requiring the Producing Party 's Use ofPredictive Coding ..............676 C. Court-Ordered Use ofPredictive Coding................ 678 Professor of Law, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law. J.D. Candidate, Stanford Law School, 2013. The authors would like to thank Ron Dolin, William Kellerman, Matt Kesner, and Jonathan Land for discussing their firms' uses of predictive coding. While the discussion throughout this Article reflects information they provided, we have decided not to quote their comments directly so as to avoid any potential confidentiality concerns. We would also like to thank Maura Grossman and Richard Marcus for their comments on aii earlier draft of this piece. All errors, of course, remain our own. 633

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most