About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

8 Rev. Econ. Rsch. on Copyright Issues 7 (2011)

handle is hein.journals/rvwoecrh8 and id is 1 raw text is: 












     Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, 2011, vol. 8(1), pp. 7-50



   THE   GOOGLE BOOK SEARCH SETTLEMENT: A LAW AND
                         ECONOMICS ANALYSIS


                FRANK   MULLER-LANGER AND MARC SCHEUFEN


        ABSTRACT. Beginning in December 2004 Google has pursued a new project

        to create a book search engine (Google Book Search). The project has

        released a storm of controversy around the globe. While the supporters

        of Google Book Search conceive the project as a first reasonable step

        towards unlimited access to knowledge in the information age, its op-

        ponents fear profound negative effects due to an erosion of copyright

        law. Our law and economics analysis of the Book Search Project sug-

        gests that - from a copyright perspective - the proposed settlement may

        be beneficial to right holders, consumers, and Google. For instance, it

        may provide a solution to the still unsolved dilemma of orphan works.

        From a competition policy perspective, we stress the important aspect

        that Google's pricing algorithm for orphan and unclaimed works effec-

        tively replicates a competitive Nash-Bertrand market outcome under

        post-settlement, third-party oversight.





                              1. INTRODUCTION


   George  Orwell's metaphor   of a big brother  [who] is watching you  (Or-

well, 1949) appears  to be no dystopia  in 2011. The  technological revolution

ushered  in by  the internet  and  the increase of possibilities in the digital

environment   have  facilitated a framework  in which   spying on  the data  of

everyone  is a real possibility anywhere   and  at any  time.   Meanwhile,   to

We  are grateful to an anonymous referee, our colleagues and faculty members as well as
seminar participants in Rotterdam and Wiesbaden for suggestions, comments, and ques-
tions that helped us to find our way. Nevertheless, all remaining mistakes are obviously
ours. In addition, our analysis does not necessarily reflect the views of the Max Planck
Institute for Intellectual Property and Competition Law and the Institute of Law and Eco-
nomics. Finally, we wish to thank Sebastian Osterrieth for valuable research assistance.
                                       7

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most