About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

2 Rev. Econ. Rsch. on Copyright Issues 1 (2005)

handle is hein.journals/rvwoecrh2 and id is 1 raw text is: 





      Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, 2005, vol. 2(1), pp. 1-4


           INDIRECT APPROPRIABILITY 20 YEARS ON


                                RICHARD   WATT



        The  copying of other media may or may  not have impacts similar
        to those found for photocopying. Only  case-by-case empirical in-
        vestigations of institutions and markets can discover the impacts
        of these other forms of copying. (Liebowitz, 1985, p. 956).

   20 years ago, Stan  Liebowitz's famous paper  on indirect appropriability was
published in the Journal of Political Economy. At the time, it would surely have
been impossible to predict the impact that the paper, together with two or three
others published in the same journal at around the same time (Novos and Waldman,
1984, and Johnson,  1985), would have on the fledgling area of economics that was
being re-born  under the label of the economics of copyright.2
   In the intervening 20 years, the idea forwarded by Liebowitz - that the ability
to copy increases the value that purchasers place on originals, thereby increasing
their willingness to pay, and (under certain conditions) allowing sellers of originals
to capture the value of copies when originals are priced - has been one of the most
provocative, most commented   and  most applied ideas upon  which the economics
of copyright rode its way out of the shadows of economic theory. In part, this was
surely due to the counter intuitive nature of the idea, something which economists
in general seem to embrace with uncanny  fervor. It has been said that wherever a
counter intuitive result may be hiding, an economist will be lurking around close
by. Such  is the stuff of which many a great theoretical economics reputation has
been made.
   Indirect appropriability is such a powerful idea because of its simplicity. All stu-
dents of undergraduate  economics learn about  price discrimination, under which
a seller can appropriate a greater share of consumer surplus by charging different
prices to different consumer groups. Price discrimination is possible, and is profi-
table, when different groups of consumers of a single product have different willin-
gness' to pay. For the copying example,  the differences in willingness to pay are
derived from the value of downstream copying, and  so if the purchasers of the ori-
ginal units that will serve as models for subsequent copies can be identified, then
it will be profitable to charge them a higher price than what is charged to other

   10f course, the economics of copyright was not first concieved in the mid-1980s, but quite some
time before that. Many authors point to Arnold Plant's pathbreaking work as seminal in the field
(Plant, 1934), and others have even noted clear foundations in the work of Adam Smith (see
Gordon, 2003). However, it is fair to say that it was in the mid-1980s, with the enormous impact
of new copying technologies and environments (photocopying of written pages, analog copying of
music, and even the first computer programmes), that the economics profession really sat up and
took notice.
   2Currently, Liebowitz's paper has had over 100 cites, counting several that contain misspellings
of the author's name and page number errors. It is the most heavily cited paper in the, admittedly
small, field of the economics of copying.
                                        1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most