About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

74 Rutgers Univ. L. Rev. Commentaries 101 (2021-2022)

handle is hein.journals/rgsusty74 and id is 1 raw text is: 









A  NEW   START  DOWN   AN  OLD  ROAD   TOWARD SUBSTANTIVE
     VOTER   EQUALITY FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES

                         Tyler Creighton

                       TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION  ......................................................................................... 101
I. THE HISTORY AND CURRENT STATE OF VOTING WITH A DISABILITY.... 104
II. CONTRASTING APPROACHES TO THE ADA AND VOTING RIGHTS......... 108
      A. An Initial Misguided Approach: Mere Technical Equality ... 110
      B. A Better Path Forward: Substantive Equality, Too............... 113
III. ROADBLOCKS TO SUBSTANTIVE EQUALITY?....................................... 118
CONCLUSION............................................................................................. 122


                          INTRODUCTION

    As the June 2020 state primary election in Pennsylvania approached,
Joseph Drenth, who is legally blind, faced an untenable choice: vote by
mail and sacrifice the ability to cast a private and independent vote, or
continue to vote privately and independently at a polling location and
sacrifice the health and safety of himself and his family due to the
COVID-19  pandemic?1 Fortunately, a preliminary injunction ordering
the state to implement a remote accessible vote-by-mail system made
such a choice unnecessary for Mr. Drenth.2 Unfortunately, voters with
disabilities in many other jurisdictions throughout the country were not
so lucky. Even as the threat of COVID-19 hopefully moves to our rearview
mirrors, Mr. Drenth's successful lawsuit highlighted a critical but
underutilized legal tool for ensuring that voters with disabilities are
afforded an equal voting experience-including the ability to cast a
private and independent ballot-as compared to other voters.
    New technology and federal investments over the last few decades
have finally enabled Mr. Drenth and millions of other Americans with
visual, manual dexterity, and cognitive impairments to cast private and


   1. Complaint at 11-12, Drenth v. Boockvar, No. 1:20-CV-00829, 2020 WL 2745729
(M.D. Pa. May 27, 2020).
   2. See Drenth, 2020 WL 2745729 at *6.


101

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most