About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

23 Regulation 15 (2000)
The Stadium Gambit and Local Economic Development

handle is hein.journals/rcatorbg23 and id is 93 raw text is: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT POLICY
We play the Star Spangled Banner before every game
-you want us to pay taxes too? -Bill Veeck

The Stadium Gambit and
Local Economic Development

BY DENNIS COATES AND
BRAD R. HUMPHREYS

N RECENT YEARS SPORTS FRANCHISES HAVE FREQUENTLY
used their monopoly power to extract rents from state and

* local governments. Typically, a franchise owner declares an
existing facility unsuitable. Perhaps it is too old, or too
small, or lacks enough luxury boxes or suites to raise the necessary revenues to field a competitive team. The owner reminds
the local government and business community that many other cities would like to have a team, and those cities would also
build a new stadium. Cities all over the country, desperate for a professional sports team, gear up to convince the owner to

move. Often, the promise of a new stadium and a sweetheart
lease convinces the owner to stay, but some franchises
move. Regardless of whether the team stays or goes, tax-
payers foot the bill for a new stadium, improvements to an
existing stadium, or infrastructure needed to make the new
stadium or arena as attractive as possible.
The practice of professional sports profiting at the
expense of taxpayers is not new. Before the stadium gam-
bit there was the tax shelter dodge in which the purchase and
reorganization of a team could generate up to five years of
losses, which could be used to offset the new owner's
income from other ventures. And there is the common
practice of funding stadium construction using private-
purpose local bonds because their interest payments are
exempt from federal income taxation and they therefore
carry a lower interest rate. The net effect is that the federal
government subsidizes construction of the stadiums and are-
nas built by state and local governments for professional
Dennis Coates is associate professor and Brad R. Humphreys is assistant
professor of economics at the University of Maryland Baltimore County

sports franchises. Indeed, closing the loophole in the law that
allowed this subsidy has simply been replaced by explicit
state and local funding of stadiums that can be turned over
rent free to franchises.
The recent spate of sweetheart stadium and arena deals
is only the latest manifestation of owners of professional
sports franchises getting richer at the public's expense.
While not entirely new, this phenomenon has become
front-page news across the country in recent years. Com-
bined with the build it and they will come attitude of
many city governments, the stadium gambit has led to a
marked increase in new stadium and arena construction,
franchise relocations, and negotiations between teams and
local governments.
Despite the beliefs of local officials and their hired con-
sultants about the economic benefits of publicly subsidized
stadium construction, the consensus of academic econo-
mists has been that such policies do not raise incomes. The
results that we describe in this article are even more pes-
simistic. Subsidies of sports facilities may actually reduce
the incomes of the alleged beneficiaries.

REGULATION       VOLUME 23, No. 2

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most