About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

17 Punishment & Soc'y 3 (2015)

handle is hein.journals/punscty17 and id is 1 raw text is: 




Article
                                                                 Punishment & Society
                                                                 2015, Vol. 17(1) 3-26
'One       cannot        legislate                             @ The Author(s) 2015
                                                              Reprints and permissions:
kind ness            Am     biguities                 sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav
                                                         DOl: 10.1177/1462474514560186
in   European           legal                                       pun.sagepub.com

instruments on

non-custodial sanctions

Dirk  van   Zyl  Smit
University of Nottingham, UK

Sonja   Snacken
Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium

David   Hayes
University of Sheffield, UK




Abstract
Non-custodial sanctions, particularly those that are implemented in the community,
have different historical roots in common- and civil-law jurisdictions. Nevertheless,
various European instruments seek to shape the imposition and implementation of
such sanctions uniformly across the continent. These instruments reflect an apparent
consensus about penal values, culminating in 1992 with the adoption of the European
Rules on  Community   Sanctions and  Measures  and of the  Recommendation   on
Consistency in Sentencing. In spite of the apparent pan-European consensus, some
tensions remained as a result of underlying doctrinal differences and of the comprom-
ises that were required to accommodate them. In the 21st century further European
initiatives have sought to go beyond the 1992 instruments and focus on 'what works'
and on the development of probation services. In the process, the central objective of
penal reductionism, so important in I992, has become somewhat marginalised. This
shortcoming can be addressed by reconsidering the approaches that had been rejected
in the earlier search for consensus and by developing a more comprehensive under-
standing of the human rights safeguards to which all penal sanctions should be subject.


Corresponding author:
Dirk van Zyl Smit, Univeristy of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
Email: Dirk.Van-zyl-smit@nottingham.ac.uk

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most