About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

15 Punishment & Soc'y 3 (2013)

handle is hein.journals/punscty15 and id is 1 raw text is: 




Article
                                                                     Punishment & Society
                                                                            15(1) 3-22
Terror        carceralism            :                             @ The Author(s) 2012
                                                                 Reprints and permissions:
Surye ill an ce, security                                sagepub.co.uk/journalsPernissions.nav
                                                            DOl: 10.1177/1462474512466197
governance              and                                            pun.sagepub.com

de/civilization                                                           $SAGE

Jeffrey   Monaghan
Queen's University, Canada




Abstract
Following the first I5 convictions under the 2001 Anti-Terrorism Act, Canadian penal
authorities developed new surveillance and security practices targeting this small popu-
lation of prisoners. Primarily, reforms ensure that terror convicts are labelled as highly
dangerous  offenders, despite any of them having participated in attacks or violence.
Focusing on  the Canadian  context, this article contributes to recent scholarship by
discussing how  these emergent  penal  practices are informed by  a convergence  of
domestic  anti-terrorism policies and a networked field of counter-terrorism experts;
what  Bigo calls (in)security management professionals. Detailing recent debates and
reforms, I focus on emergent  'deradicalization' strategies that are informed by trans-
national 'working groups'  and (in)security management  actors. I argue  that these
increasingly illiberal counter-terrorism practices are framed as measures of social
defence against the enemies of western civilization. Yet, paradoxically, these emergent
security practices are antithetical to the 'civilizing process' of penal modernism, further
displacing discourses of rehabilitation or reintegration and entrenching a 'criminology of
the other'. I conclude by discussing what I call new practices of terror carceralism,
which  represent  an entrenchment   of vengeance  and  retribution, justifying a host
of invasive surveillance and security measures against those caricaturized as captured
terrorist others.


Keywords
insecurity, prisons, punishment, rehabilitation, terrorism


Corresponding author:
Jeffrey Monaghan, Department of Sociology, D431 Mackintosh-Corry, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario,
K7L 3N6, Canada.
Email: j.monaghan@queensu.ca

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most