About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

70 Prison J. i (1990)

handle is hein.journals/prsjrnl70 and id is 1 raw text is: 


Preface


          If we select certain prisoners to bear the burden of heavier sentences... surely we
     have a moral obligation at least to allow those serving extended terms an opportunity
     to make some constructive use of the time we have demanded of them. And unless we
     intend to lock them away forever, our reasons for attempting to rehabilitate these
     prisoners are not only moral but eminently practical. (Norval Morris, The Future of
     Imprisonment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1974).
     When   the Pennsylvania Prison Society asked me to edit a special issue of the
Prison Journal on the topic of long-term incarceration and long-term prisoners, it was
an opportunity for me to return to my scholarly roots. When I began to study long-term
inmates nearly 15 years ago, it was with the encouragement of Professor Donald J. New-
man.  Newman   wisely predicted that much of what we now call sentencing reform
would eventually produce more prisoners, more long-term prisoners, and fewer relief
valves for correctional administrators to manage the resulting prisoner population. In
addition, Newman  argued that virtually nothing was known about the prison experience
of long-term inmates and that policy and program development in this area were embry-
onic. Therefore, he concluded, whatever one wrote about long-term inmates in the mid-
1970s was destined to become a seminal work in the area!
      It would be difficult to argue with the accuracy of Donald Newman's prediction
about the effects of sentencing reform on state and federal prison populations in the
United  States. Correctonal administrators across the country are today struggling to
keep ahead of the demand for prison space. Most are beginning to recognize that many
more  of the prisoners that they receive from the courts today will spend the majority of
their adult working lives in confinement.
      The  influx of unprecendented numbers  of long-term prisoners into state and
 federal prison systems in the U.S. and abroad presents several dilemmas. First, the
 long sentences that these prisoners are serving represent a long-term demand on an
 increasingly expensive resource -cell space. More importantly, we are beginning to
 realize that we lack models for understanding how to organize a long prison sentence
 toward a goal of constructive or meaningful use of time. Given an inmate with 36
 months to serve, we are adept at prescribing a series of programs with discrete learning
 objectives directed toward measurable improvement in skills, knowledge and experi-
 ence by the time of release. Facing an inmate with 36 years to serve, however, produces
 a muddled response that reveals our inability to think about such lengthy sentences in the
 same terms. Morris reminds us that we have an obligation to provide opportunities for
 inmates serving extended terms to make constructive use of their time, and the papers
 in this volume are a first step in initiating this dialogue. The authors of these papers dis-
 cuss, describe, propose, examine, criticize and question current thinking on long-term
 prisoners. Efforts to improve the prison experience of long-term inmates are described.
 The kinds of thinking and investment needed to deliver better, more effective correc-
 tional services for long-term inmates are described.
       To assess the problem from the ground level, I asked a select group of leading
 correctional administrators to comment on the administrative and policy challenges
 posed by an increasing volume and proportion of long-term inmates in their prisons, and
 to describe the kinds of information, programs, policies and priorities that are needed
 to address the challenge. These Reports From the Field provide an invaluable per-
 spective, from the point of view of those who are charged with organizing and adminis-
 tering prisons for long-term inmates. Finally, Professors Robert Sherwin and James
 Acker  debate a proposal for radically altering the basis for criminal sentencing in
 America.
                                       -1-

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most