About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

14 Prof. Law. 1 (2002-2003)

handle is hein.journals/proflw14 and id is 1 raw text is: Is Diversion a Viable Alternative to Traditional Discipline?:
Fail 2002            teT        ni         yn'i
Vlo14  AnAnalysis of the First Ten Years in Arizona'
Issue  tumitI  Diane Al. Ellis

i     c State tiar ofAri7ona, although the first
regulatory entity to develop a cafeteria
plan of diversion programs as alterna-
tives to traditional lawyer discipline, is
ceitainly not the first to struggle with the
issue of lawyers whose lack of management acu-
men tesults in dissatisfied clients and expensive
prosecution of minor misconduct. Professional
regulation of lawycts has been studied and report-
ed for the past 30t years, beginning with the publi-
catiore in 1971 ot Pvblec and Rccoincihndations
in Disciplinary Eni/bnevncnt (known as the Clark
Rcpotl)2, pitodaced by the Special Connnaittee on
Evalhuation of Disciplinary tinthbicenetni, whose
chair wavs frmner U.S. Supreme Coutt Justice Tot
Clark  (Aiicrican iHar Association   Special
Contiltcie on    valuation  of' Disciplinary
En forceinent, 197(0). The Clark Report identities
Prohlem 16 (of 26) as No informal admonitot,
procedures to dispose at' matters involving minor
misconduct (Clark Re pli, 1970). The ieport
sumtnarizcs it this way:
The disciplinary agency that has no alter-
native but to dismiss a complaint or prose-
cute a formal disciplinary proceeding will
oflen decide to dismiss. Prosecut ion ofa for-
meal disciplinary proceeding prcdicatcd on
an instance of minor niiscondnct is unduly
harsh, wastes the agency's limited manpuw-
er and financial resources on relatively
insignificant tiatters. arid, particularly in
large urban areas, overburdens the courl
having disciplinary jurisdiction...
The disitissal of complaints involving
rinoi  misconduct, necessitated by the limit-
ed alternatives available to the disciplinary
agency.. subjects the profession to criticism
by tire public. The complainant who knows
Daero M, Ells is h~o Director of hei Laviit Aslstance Pragriam, Law
OIf ce Managemcnt Asisla ce Program, and Member Astsiranco
Prcgrom for the Stale Bar c¢ Nizona.

hat the accuw.d altorney has been guilty ot'
misconductl htll is unaware t' the linited
altenalives available it the disciplinary
agency tay concluet that the disnissal evi-
dences the lrofession's disinlercst in clice-
lively policing its mncmcis (Clark rlrepit.
1970).
The Clark Report concluded that the accused
attorney may misinterpret the dismissal of the
cotnplait against him as asm indication that the
disciplinary agency is either ineffective or disin-
terested. The Committee also expressed concern
that disiissal of nunerous minor matters may
inumuitize the attotney guilty of repetitive acts of
inini misconduct from substantial discipline.
The fburth and finial concern was that disciplinary
counsel may sulffer loss of enthusiasm from expe-
riencing the liusttiation of finding themselves
unable to dispose properly.., of minor miscon-
dutct in tle thce ot' no alternatives.
The Coitirittce additionally notedl that discipli-
nary syslems also have inadequate provision tor
dealing with alttloncys incapacitated by reason at
mental illness, senilily (t aiddieion to drugs or
intoxicanls, AlthirLih the Comnittee pionioted
establishmncl of inl'urnial admonitions, the con-
cept of'diversion was not raised in the ieputit's
193 pages. The report did, however, iccoininend
additional ancillary services, including fee athitra-
tion and client security fuids to protect clients
harmed by the dishonesty of their lawyers. The
State Bar of Arizona has itpleneited hIolh t
those recommendalions in the inlervening years.
'Iwo decades after issuance of the Clark Report,
another group brought together by the American
Bar Association, the Commission on Evaluation
of Disciplinary Lntorcement (known as the
McKay ComnmissionPl adopted reconnienda-
tions, including altenatives to traditional, puni-
Cenitrted oi page 4

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most