About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

11 Prof. Law. 1 (1999-2000)

handle is hein.journals/proflw11 and id is 1 raw text is: A            •   •III           I II   •lA                I
theS                           S  6   S        *S 5 6   .*   ~   S
...............................................................................U...............................................nSINLWE

t;ommission on Iultiaisciplinary rractice
Updated Background and Informational Report
and Request for Comments

Introduction
In  August   1999, the   Commission    on
Multidisciplinary Practice (Commission) recom-
mended that the Model Rules of Professional
Conduct be amended, subject to certain restric-
tions, to permit a lawyer to partner with a non-
lawyer even if the activities of the enterprise con-
sisted of the practice of law and to share legal fees
with a nonlawyer.1 After conducting more than
sixty hours of public hearings, listening to the tes-
timony of fifty-six witnesses, and receiving written
comments from interested individuals and organi-
zations, the Commission concluded that such a
change was in the best interest of the public, would
expand the availability of legal services, and would
facilitate the development of a new business struc-
ture enabling lawyers to reconfigure their practices
to assist clients in resolving multidisciplinary
problems. However, in recognition of the differ-
ences between the legal profession and other pro-
fessions and so to ensure that the core values of the
legal profession, which exist for the protection of
the public, were adequately safeguarded, the
Commission recommended the adoption of a certi-
fication-and-audit  regulatory  regime.  See
Commission on Multidisciplinary Practice, Report
to the House of Delegates, (http:www.abanet.org/
cpr/mdprecommendation.htlm)
The Commission presented its Recommendation
to the House for debate on August 10, but in recog-
nition of the many requests by state and local bar
associations for more time to consider the issues,
moved to defer the vote. The House subsequently
voted to substitute and adopt a resolution of The
Florida Bar that reads as follows:
Resolved, that the    American   Bar
Association make no change, addition or
amendment to     the  Model Rules    of
Professional Conduct which permits a

lawyer to offer legal services through a mul-
tidisciplinary practice unless and until addi-
tional study demonstrates that such changes
will further the public interest without sacri-
ficing or compromising lawyer indepen-
dence and the legal profession's tradition of
loyalty to clients.
Exchanges on the floor of the House in con-
nection with the Resolution made it clear that the
Commission could continue to study issues relat-
ed to MDPs and report back to the House when it
determined such action was appropriate. In
response to the concerns expressed in the
Resolution, Commission members have made
themselves available to discuss the issues raised
by the Commission's Report and receive com-
ments directed toward possible changes to the
Commission's position. In particular, Commission
members have endeavored to work with state and
local bar associations in advancing the discus-
sion.2 The Commission has invited state and local
bar associations that have been studying the issues
to participate in an open discussion at the ABA
Midyear Meeting in Dallas on Saturday, February
12. In addition, ABA President William Paul has
announced a town hall meeting on multidiscipli-
nary practice in Dallas on Sunday, February 13.
The Commission     is issuing  this Updated
Background and Informational Report in order to
(1) provide an overview of pertinent develop-
ments that have occurred since the August 10
vote; (2) summarize and reply to the comments
and criticisms that have been made in response to
the Commission's Recommendation and Report;
and (3) encourage further dialog. Part I of this
Report describes the pertinent developments both
in the United States and abroad since August 10.
Part II identifies the major criticisms directed to
Continued on page 4

Fall 1999
Volume 11
Issue Number 1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most