About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

5 Pub. Cont. Newsl. 1 (1969-1970)

handle is hein.journals/procurlw5 and id is 1 raw text is: 





M
SECTION OF
PUBLIC CONTRACT LAW
AMERICAN BAR
ASSOCIATION

Vol. 5, No. 1, October 1969


FEDERAL STATE & LOCAL GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS


Paul Shnitzer, Editor, 1803 Cody Drive, Silver Spring, Md. 20902
              Moody R. Tidwell, III, Assistant Editor


Public Contract Section Meeting at Dallas
by Carl F. Paul of the D. C. Bar

The Public Contract Section met in Dallas, Texas, at the
Annual Meeting of the American Bar Association on August
II and 12, 1969. The initial session on August II at the
Dallas Memorial Auditorium dealt with Direct Con-
sequential and Liquidated damages in Government Con-
tracts-Right of Government Prime Contractors and Third
Parties to Recover, with Gilbert Cuneo, Chairman; as
moderator, and a Panel of William Munves and F. Trow-
bridge vom Baur. Presentations were made by four mem-
bers of the Section. John E. Cavanaugh pointed out that
private product liability insurance costs about $1.25 per
$1000.00 and clarification of prime and subcontractor's
liability is essential. Overton A. Currie discussed the
applicable principles of damages. Walter L. Pettit pointed
out that provisions for liquidated damages are now on
occasion found in research and development contracts and
supply contracts, not just in construction contracts. In
addition to discussing the rationale given for including them
and pointing out their limitations, Mr. Pettit discussed the
five basic defenses to the assessment of liquidated damages.
Frederick Sass, Jr., discussed the contractor's normal
contractual warranty and his obligations to deliver a
product conforming to the specifications and without
defects.
  Trowbridge vom Baur expressed concern over the trend
that developed over the past several years of shifting risks
to the Contractor. If this is followed with reference to
product liability even though the Government has principal
responsibility for :ts products, the trend will be away from
defense and Government business.
  The Annual Luncheon meeting at the Baker Hotel was
presided over by Gilbert Cuneo, Chairman of the Section.
The luncheon speaker, Chief Judge Wilson Cowen of the
Court of Claims, pointed out that while only a very small
percentage of Board of Contract Appeals Cases are there-
after filed in Court, both the administrative and the judicial
remedy now take as long as or longer than they once did.
The review process has presented more problems to the
Court of Claims than was anticipated, and time alone has
become a significant factor in the delay experienced until a
contractor finally receives payment of his claim. Judge
Cowen therefore, proposed instead of the adoption of an
All Disputes Clause, either (1) giving the contractor the
option of appealing the dispute directly to the applicable
Board, or filing a suit directly in court, where he would


obtain a trial de novo, or (2) the adoption of the Cellar bill
H.R. 10765, introduced April 9, 1964, giving a right of
appeal to a court, with a trial de novo, with a rebuttable
presumption of correctness attaching to the administrative
proceedings.
  The first of the two sessions on August 12 at the Baker
Hotel was Moderated by Geoffrey Creyke, Jr., on the
subject Issuance of Procurement Regulations-What can
the Bar, Industry and Trade Association Do to Protect and
Promote the Interests of Prime and Subcontractors with
Panelists Harold Gold and James V. Joy, Jr. The Chairman
of the ASPR Committee, Captain E. C. Chapman, U.S.N.,
discussed in detail the lengthy steps in making procurement
regulations. The Committee itself is small, and subcommit-
tees, set up as cases arise, perform a substantial portion of
the work.
  Coordination is provided for with eighteen industry
associations and with other Government agencies such as
GAO, GSA, and NASA. Matters of major policy are
frequently decided by SEC Def., after comment by the
Ass't Sec. Def. One of the principal problem areas has been
a better quality input from the individual military services
and from industry. Captain Chapman, however, made it
clear that the Committee's purpose is the protection of the
Government's long term interests and it was his view that
publication in the Federal Register, as was suggested in the
discussion, would not be worthwhile in view of the
widespread coverage given by ASPR Committees proposals
by professional journals.
  Informative presentations were made by John Love, Jr.,
and John A. McWhorter, both of Washington, D.C., and
Prof. John W. Whelan of the University of California Law
School.
  The final session dealt with the Government Right of
Appeal from an Adverse Decision of a Board of Contract
Appeals. Are recent Developments Consistent with Govern-
ment-Wide Disputes Procedures? Under Moderator Marshall
J. Doke, Jr., and Panelists Harold L. Blasky and Paul L.
Hannah, six presentations were made. George M. Coburn
discussed the Attorney General's opinion of January 16,
1969, and expressed concern that the finality of board of
contract appeals decisions may be subject to attempts by
employees of the contracting agencies to upset those
adverse to the Government by reporting dissatisfaction to
the Department of Justice or the GAO, and by delaying
payment. Irving Jaffee took the position that this was not
an attack on finality, but the exercise of a right in the
Government, coexistent with that of the private party, to
                                  (continued on page 2)

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most