About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

31 Prob. J. 1 (1984)

handle is hein.journals/probj31 and id is 1 raw text is: Probation
Journal
Published by the National Association of
Probation Officers
Editor: Nigel Stone
Editorial Advisory Board: Andrew Bridges,
Jenny Kirkpatrick (ex officio), Alan Mortimer,
Sue Priestley, David Reaich, Peter Simpson,
Andy Stelman
Price £1.25 (free to members)

ISSN 0264-5505

COMMENT
Managing Change
Yes, I know that a probation periodical has
existed for a half-century, but Probation Journal,
as such, first appeared in March 1974, and a decade
of endeavour is worth a modest cheer.
This isn't intended to be a banal and tedious
exercise in prediction. But it is gratifying that an
anniversary issue contains an attempt to make sense
of the staffing and management trends in the
Service. The lack of such analysis is extraordinary,
compared to work on the Social Services since
Seebohm, and local government at large,
suggesting the organisational insularity of
Probation and evolutionary change that has not
required major stock-taking and theoretical input.
Yet clearly there have been profound changes,
particularly in some areas where powerful Chiefs
have been able to reshape their county operations
to conform to a strong centralist blueprint, creating
a probation equivalent of a Directorate of Social
Services.
All areas are evolving gradually away from the
simple, pyramidical management of a unitary
resource, the befriending influence of generic
probation officers. It seems remarkable that the
Service has used ancillary workers only since

1971. It is perhaps more remarkable that the
development of this potential has been so
haphazard and piecemeal, and their numbers in
relation to qualified officers so unbalanced.
The common wisdom for a probation team
suggests a basic one-six-one formation. Now we
hear that Home Office thinking favours larger
team-to-senior ratios, given the growing strength,
qualifications and experience of main grade
workers. Attempts to vary seniors away from the
often debilitating and inflexible wheel hub role are
encouraging, and re-formations in larger offices
to utilize varying senior skills to better advantage
have been liberating. So has the growth of prac-
titioner support groups, beyond traditional
supervision, particularly in new, more exacting
areas of work.
The greatest revolution, however, has been in
ancillary services, so that the title 'ancillary' ceases
to carry much meaning, as we recruit a growing
army of specialists in housing, employment, and
research, plus 'educationalists', residential social
workers, group workers, workshop managers and
community workers. The plant, both personal and
physical, is growing, but we haven't developed
management strategies, pay and training to match.
Haxby earlier suggested that the Service could
profitably employ its own solicitors, psychiatrists
and psychologists. That would revise thoughts on
ancillary staff!
This diversification clearly raises considerable
employment protection questions for probation
officers, and the risk of erosion of standards. In the
training sphere, there are already worrying
implications arising from the CSS (Certificate in
Social Service) which has some attraction for
managements seeking competent operatives. More
recently, influential proposals' for the

1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most