About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

24 Psych., Crime & L. 1 (2018)

handle is hein.journals/pcyceadl24 and id is 1 raw text is: PSYCHOLOGY, CRIME & LAW, 2018                                              R     e
VOL. 24, NO. 1, 1-13
https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2017.1351968                             Taylor & Francis Group
Beliefs about secondary confession evidence: a survey of
laypeople and defense attorneys
Kylie N. Keya, Jeffrey S. Neuschatzb, Brian H. Bornsteinc, Stacy A. Wetmored, Katie
M. Luechtb, Kimberly S. Dellapaolerac and Deah S. Quinlivane
'Department of Psychology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA; bDepartment of Psychology, The
University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL, USA; cDepartment of Psychology, University of Nebraska -
Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA; dDepartment of Psychology, Butler University, Indianapolis, IN, USA; 'Florida
Southern College, Lakeland, FL, USA
ABSTRACT                                                         ARTICLE HISTORY
We surveyed students, community members, and defense attorneys    Received 19 February 2017
regarding beliefs about secondary confession evidence (i.e. when a  Accepted 29 June 2017
third party tells authorities that a person has confessed to him or
her) from  jailhouse informants and    other sources. Results    KEYWORDS
indicated that laypeople perceive secondary confessions as less  Scondar confessts; ror
credible than other types of evidence (e.g. forensics, DNA,       perceptions; defense
eyewitness testimony), and they are knowledgeable about factors   attorneys; incentives
that may influence the veracity of secondary confessions, such as
incentives or previous testimony. However, they underestimated
or were uncertain about how persuasive secondary confessions
would be to themselves or other jurors. Compared to laypeople,
defense attorneys were more sensitive about issues affecting the
reliability of secondary confessions.
Secondary confessions, or admissions of a person's guilt by a third party, are frequently
utilized by the legal system for prosecutorial information and are considered common
practice in many different kinds of cases (Mazur, 2002; Natapoff, 2011; Rappold, 2005).
They are especially frequent when there is little other evidence available to the prosecu-
tion (Cassidy, 2004; Elliot, 2003), which is ironic given that the veracity of secondary con-
fessions is questionable at best. Prosecutors are allowed to offer incentives such as
reduced sentences in exchange for information (Giglio v. United States, 1972; United
States v. Singleton, 1998), despite the U.S. Supreme Court repeatedly indicating that provid-
ing incentives is motivation for the informant to falsify secondary confessions. Because
prosecutors benefit from informant information, they are unlikely to subsequently prose-
cute the informant for perjury (lying under oath), which leaves informants with much to
gain and little fear of repercussions (Bloom, 2002). The recidivism rate is higher for jail-
house informants than regular prisoners (L.A. Grand Jury Report, 1990), which may
suggest that informants have less concern for future incarceration because they have a
proven escape plan.
CONTACT Kylie N. Key  kylie.key@gmail.com - Department of Psychology, University of Oklahoma, 455 W. Lindsey
Street, Dale Hall Tower, Room 705, Norman, OK 73019-2007, USA
0 Supplemental data for this article can be accessed at https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.201 7.1351968
© 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most