About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

43 Pace L. Rev. 1 (2022-2023)

handle is hein.journals/pace43 and id is 1 raw text is: 







                 PACE LAW REVIEW

Volume  43                    Fall 2022                    Number  1


             Mutually Intelligible Principles?

                          Andrew   J. Ziaja*

1.    INTRODUCTION  ..............................................................................................  2
II.    WAYMAN  IN SCHOLARLY DEBATE  FROM NONDELEGATION   TO
      M AJOR Q UESTIONS.......................................................................................  5
      A.   Debate Between   Whitman  and Gundy.........................................7
      B.   D ebate Since Gundy ..........................................................................14
III.  FOLLOWING  WAYMAN   FROM  GUNDY  THROUGH  JARKESY AND
      W  EST V IRGINIA..........................................................................................  24
      A.   Gundy v. United States................................................................  24
      B.  Jarkesy v. SE C...................................................................................  27
      C.   W est Virginia v. EPA ....................................................................  33
IV.   A MORE  FAITHFUL READING  OF WAYMAN............................................ 43
V .   C O N CLU SIO N ....................................................................................................5 0

                              Abstract
     Are the nondelegation, major questions, and political question doc-
trines mutually intelligible? This article asks whether there is more than
superficial resemblance between  the nondelegation, major  questions,
and  political question concepts in Wayman  v. Southard, 23  U.S. (10
Wheat.) 1 (1825), an early nondelegation case that has become focal in
recent   nondelegation   and   major    questions  scholarship   and


*M.P.A. magna cum laude, Sciences Po (Paris Institute of Political Studies); J.D., Uni-
versity of California, College of the Law, San Francisco (formerly UC Hastings); Grad-
uate Fellowship, History, University of California, Berkeley; B.A. with honors and dis-
tinction, History, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Andrew Ziaja is an attorney
serving with the National Labor Relations Board in Washington, D.C., and a former
partner at Leonard Carder LLP in San Francisco and Oakland, California. The views
expressed in this article are his alone and not those of the National Labor Relations
Board, the United States Government, or any other entity. All errors are also his alone.
He would like to especially thank Sonya Ziaja and Brigham Daniels for their thought-
ful readings.


1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most