About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

6 Oyez Oyez Bull. Sec. Jud. Admin. 1 (1963)

handle is hein.journals/oyzoyz6 and id is 1 raw text is: 














oeylz


o1


The Bulletin of the Section of Judicial Administration


Special guest, The Right Honorable Lord Parker of Waddington, center,
traveled from England to attend the Annual Meeting and participate
in its program. He is seen with Mr. Justice William Brennan, left, and
Judge Joe E. Estes.

               SHOULD CIVIL JURIES
                   BE  ABOLISHED?
   Writing in the Chicago Daily Law  Bulletin, a member
of the Chicago Bar  advocates immediate abandonment  of
the civil jury.
   At the present time, he believes, our courts are inade-
quate to deal with disputes which come before them, and
although  the great bulk  of disputes, particularly those
involving tort liability, do not even reach our courts, the
very small percentage which do overwhelm court capacity.
The  present case backlog in Cook County of some 73,000
civil suits, with the number moving upward each year, it
is said, bears mute testimony that, as matters stand, our
profession has not yet attacked the true cause of this con-
gestion. The key to the failure of the court system, accord-
ing to the writer, lies in the insistence of the legal profes-
sion on retaining the civil jury system. The shortcomings of
that institution have been concealed rather than examined
by the legal profession, he says. While legislative hurdles
may  exist blocking an early effective change, the writer
feels that the obligation exists nevertheless for the legal
profession to bring into the light of day those arguments
against, as well as in favor of the present civil jury system.
                  (Continued on page 4)


THE CHAIRMAN'S COLUMN
To  the members of the Section of Judicial Administration:
  The  greatest challenge to the Section of Judicial Ad-
ministration for the coming year is presented by the record
of the past year. As the readers of this Bulle in know, the
progress in judicial administration during thy' past twelve
months  has exceeded  many  years of earlier history. The
adoption of major  features of the American 3ar Associa-
tion plan for judicial selection
and the reorganization of sev-
eral major court systems has
made   1962 a year to be re-
membered   by  all who  have
worked  to  improve  the ad-
ministration of justice. The
completion of 17 seminars for
trial judges originally spon-
sored by the National Confer-
ence of State Trial Judges and
carried this year by the Joint       Ivan Lee Holt, Jr.
Committee   for the Effective
Administration of Justice has sparked a renaissance in the
thinking  of many   trial judges throughout the  United
States about their specific problems. The adoption of the
Model  Judicial Article for state constitutions by the House
of Delegates of the American Bar Association was in itself
a major accomplishment. We  lie in great danger of resting
on our laurels.
  However,  there are many states whose judges still oper-
ate without benefit of a judicial conference. The American
Bar Association Plan for Selection and Tenure of Judges
has been adopted in only a handful of states and the con-
stitutions of many states, especially with respect to their
judicial articles, date back to pre-Civil War days. The
accomplishments  of the past year  serve to indicate the
wide-range of possibilities which are before us.
  As  the new year began your Chairman pledged  the sup-
port of the Section of Judicial Administration again to the
Joint Committee for the Effective Administration of Justice.
The  Committee   is planning a major  drive to help the
metropolitan judges solve their own problems through an
interchange of ideas. It is working on a television series
with National Education Television which will present the
problems of the judiciary to the American people. It will
continue to hold its seminars and conferences for judges
on selection and tenure. The Joint Committee operates as
                  (Continued on page 2)


/Z

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most