About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

14 Oyez Oyez Bull. Sec. Jud. Admin. 1 (1971)

handle is hein.journals/oyzoyz14 and id is 1 raw text is: 

The Bulletin of the Section of Judicial Administration


oy(ez!


oyez!l


VOL.  14, NO. 1
FEBRUARY 1971


The  Chairman's  Column   in this issue contains a
special message and a request to all members of the
Section.


CHAIRMAN'S COLUMN
To the Members of the Section of Judicial Administration:

    I sometimes wonder how many members  of the Section
read The  Chairman's Column.  More than a few, I hope,
though I hardly can fault anyone who fails on occasion to
do  so in view of the flood of publications with which
                     judges, practicing attorneys and law
                     teachers must cope. Insofar as the
                     Section and the three judges' Con-
                     ferences are  concerned, however,
                     communications   is and  always
                     has been a problem. There are more
                     than  seven thousand  members  in
                     the Section of Judicial Administra-
                     tion, but only a relative few can be
                     actively involved at any one time,
   William B. West III serving as officers, members of the
Council or Conference Executive Committees, or on various
working committees. This column, therefore, is about the
only means we have of letting everyone know what is going
on.  Unfortunately, it is one way communications only,
because it does not tell me what you have on your mind.
    Since so much activity goes on behind the scenes and
therefore is not visible on the surface, one easily might
conclude  that the programs  conducted  at the Annual
Meeting each summer  constitute our principal, if not our
only, objective. Nothing, of course, could be further from
the truth. This is especially so this year, however, since we
have  been in a  period of transition. There has been a
complete turnover in the Section's Chicago staff, coinciding
unfortunately with the annuat election of new chairmen for
the Section and the Conferences, so that we all have had to
start more or less from scratch. Perhaps, in a way, this has
been fortunate because it has prompted us to sit down and
take a good hard look at ourselves and the job we have been


doing - what are our basic objectives and priorities; how
can we do a better job; can we develop a closer relationship
with state bar associations and other organizations working
to improve the administration of justice; is it possible to
involve more of our membership   in the activities of the
Section and the Conferences; can practicing attorneys and
law teachers play a more active role in our work than they
have in the past; and what are the financial imperatives and
staff requirements necessary to do the job that must be done,
etc.? I could go on at length, but the point is that we can
and must  assume a more activist role and become a more
effective force for the improvement of the administration
of justice. And the time is now. Public confidence in our
judicial system has been seriously eroded in recent years,
and there are those who would destroy the system rather
than work  to improve it. There are things which must be
changed. Some  of the criticism of the courts obviously is
unfounded, but there is much which hits the mark, and as
judges and lawyers we  should recognize that we have a
special responsibility, not only to listen to the critics, but
to work  for constructive changes in our system of justice.
This is not to minimize what has been and is being done,
both within and without the American Bar Association, to
improve judicial administration. All I am trying to say is
that we can and must do more, and do it now. The Chief
Justice of the  United States and  others have spoken
forcefully of the need to eliminate delays, improve the
efficiency of our judicial system and restore public confi-
dence in the courts. But how can we convert rhetoric into
reality? What can we do to implement these objectives?
    As you know, if you have read previous issues of OYEZ!
OYEZ!,  we have been seeking ways and means to make the
Section and the Conferences more viable and more effec-
tive, but we certainly have no monopoly when it comes to
fresh and creative ideas for accomplishing these goals. I
would  like to hear from you, and that is the whole point of
this rather unorthodox Chairman's Column.  If you have
any suggestions (and I hope that you will), please sit down
now  and write a letter to me, at the Chicago address of the
Section. We will read and study all of your letters and from
this, I trust, may come some fresh approaches to some old
problems.
    We will welcome your help as we seek to find better
ways  to  work  effectively for the improvement of the
administration of justice.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most