About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

3 Osgoode Hall Rev. L. & Pol'y 3 (2010)

handle is hein.journals/osghlrvw3 and id is 1 raw text is: 










       OSGOODE HALL REVIEW OF


                 LAW AND POLICY


    VOLUME 3               MARCH 2010                    ISSUE   1


                             COMMENT


   BEING OLD  AND  OBVIOUS:  APOTEX  v SANOFI-SYNTHELABO IN THE
                          SUPREME   COURT*


                            David  Vaver




In Apotex Inc v Sanofi-Synthelabo Canada Inc 2008 SCC 61, the Supreme
Court held, affirming the lower courts, that allegations that Sanofi's patent
for a blood anti-coagulant was invalid for obviousness and lack of novelty
were unjustified. In doing so, the Court modified the criteria of anticipation
and obviousness found in Beloit Canada Ltd v Valmet OY (1986), 8 CPR(3d)
289  (Fed CA), to align them more closely with European and American
practice. The Court found that the lower courts had erred in not recognizing
that anticipation requires both  disclosure and enablement,  and  that
obviousness may require an investigation into whether or not it was more or
less self-evident to try the course that led to the invention. The English 5-
step method of analyzing obviousness was adopted. The decision, while based
on a pre-1989 patent, seems to apply equally to post-1989 ones. The paper
takes the opportunity of discussing other statements in Beloit that have
sometimes  been misunderstood.  It concludes by applauding the lack of
discussion about  the invention's commercial success on  the  issue of
unobviousness.


* Professor of Intellectual Property Law, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University,
Toronto; Emeritus Professor of Intellectual Property & Information Technology Law,
University of Oxford; Emeritus Fellow, St Peter's College, Oxford.
* This paper is a slightly revised version of one delivered at the Federal Court Judges'
Annual Seminar held in Montreal on 7-8 October 2009. My thanks to Rothstein J and
Hughes J for helpful comments on an earlier draft. Remaining errors and infelicities
are mine alone.


3

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most