About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

74 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 161 (1999)
A Positive Theory of Chapter 11

handle is hein.journals/nylr74 and id is 175 raw text is: A POSITIVE THEORY OF CHAPTER 11 IEvIN A. KORDANA* ERIC A. POSNER** This Article is the first comprehensive analysis of the complicated voting rules of Chapter 11. Under these rules, only the debtor may propose a plan of reorganiza- tion during a lengthy exclusivity period, creditors are placed in classes wihich vote separately on the plan, voting is based on a bicameral system with both majority and supermajority requirements, and a plan may be confirned only if, among other things, every nonconsenting creditor receives at least as much as it would have if the firm were liquidated under Chapter Z Chapter 11's rules are idiosyncratic and difficult to understand, yet the literature on these rules is sparse. Several scholars have argued that it should be replaced with a system that avoids voting and relies on a more market-driven valuation process. To date however, no one has tried to understand how all of the voting rules fit together. In this aricl e Professors Kordana and Posner expand on existing bargaining models to consider bargaining with multiple creditors, paying particular attention to difficulties posed by imperfect information, and analyze all of the major voting rules in Chapter 1. The authors utilize a positive analysis to achieve an increased understanding of the existing bankruptcy system and its costs and benefits, an essential prerequisite to reform of Chapter 11. INTRODUCTION When corporations file for bankruptcy, they choose whether to enter Chapter 71 or Chapter 11.2 Under Chapter 7, the firm is liqui- dated: Its assets are sold off, and the proceeds are distributed to cred- itors roughly in order of priority. Under Chapter 11, the firm is reorganized, which means that some or all of the existing creditors and equityholders yield their contractual rights to receive transfers from the firm and receive new and usually less valuable rights in the new entity. The two chapters serve the same bankruptcy purpose of maximizing the payments to interest holders while respecting contrac- tual entitlements as much as possible. The difference is that Chapter 7 is intended to apply when the firm is worth more in pieces than as a * Associate Professor of Law, University of Virginia. ** Professor of Law, University of Chicago. Ve thank Avery Katz, Saul Levmore, Richard Posner, Robert Rasmussen, Steve Schwarcz, Robert Scott, David Skeel, George Triantis, and Steven Walt, and audiences at the University of Virginia, George Mason Uni- versity, and the American Law and Economics Association annual meeting, Berkeley, Cal- ifornia, 1998. Karen Schoen provided valuable research assistance. 1 See 11 U.S.C. §§ 701-766 (1994). 2 See 11 U.S.C. §§ 1101-1174 (1994 & Supp. 111996). 161 Imaged with the Permission of N.Y.U. Law Review

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most