About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

7 N.Y.U. L. Q. Rev. 190 (1929-1930)
Notes

handle is hein.journals/nylr7 and id is 204 raw text is: NOTES
EXTRATERRITORIAL EFFECT OF AcTs OF UNRECOGNIZED GOVERNMENTS.-Tie
recent decisions in the case of Sokoloff v. National City Bank of New Yorkl have
gone far in announcing the New York rule of cognizance of the acts of unrecog-
nized governments. In that case one Sokoloff, a Russian citizen, gave to the
National City Bank in New York some $3o,ooo with which to open an account
for him, in rubles, in Petrograd where a branch of the bank was situated. This
agreement was carried out by the bank and a pass book given to the plaintiff. In
the ordinary course of business Sokoloff drew on his account and then requested
that additional funds be transferred to the credit of the Kharkoff Mutual Aid
Society. The defendant's Petrograd branch attempted to do this by means of a
book-keeping system prevailing in Russian banks at the time, but was unsuccessful
because of turbulent conditions in Kharkoff. However, a debit was entered to
plaintiff's account and a subsequent demand for the funds refused, because of
such entry. When the bank finally learned that no credit had been received at
Kharkoff, no further payment was ever completed in that the Russian Soviet
Government, in purporting to nationalize all banks, had taken over defendant's
Petrograd branch and confiscated all of its funds. When sued in New York for
money had and received the bank set up as a defense the act of the Soviet Govern-
ment in seizing the bank and hence making performance impossible. The
motion to strike out the defense was granted and the defense denied.
In its decision the court by way of dictum declared that the acts of an un-
recognized government might be given recognition and effect by the court, if
justice and public policy so demanded, but that this ca;e warranted no such
exception.
It is to be noted that the dictum here was unnecessary to the actual decision.
As was pointed out by the court, the obligation of the defendant bank to reim-
burse the plaintiff, existed whether the confiscation of the Petrograd bank wag
by a recognized de jure or de facto government or one by no government at all.
The relation which existed between Sokoloff and the National City Bank wag
that of creditor and debtor. The obligation of the defendant was to pay plaintiff
in rubles, on demand. Under the arrangement Sokoloff obtained a chose in action
and the situs of the debt was with the defendant and when Sokoloff could not
enforce his chose in action in Petrograd he had a right to enforce it in New
York.3 Nevertheless, the court went on to establish this doctrine and an analysis
of the effect of 'acts of governments will show that not only is the thought new
but that it is a step forward from the strict doctrines established in other cases.
It is never the concern of courts as to whether or not a government is to be
accorded recognition. That is a matter for the political branch of the govern-
ment to decide and whatever may be the decision of such branch of the govern-
1239 N. Y. 158, 145 N. E. 917 (1924); 250 N. Y. 69, 164 N. E. 745 (1928).
MORSE, BANKS AND BANKING (6th ed. 1928) §289.
Matter of Houdayer, 150 N. Y. 37, 44 N. E. 718 (1896).

Imaged with the Permission of N.Y.U. Law Review

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most