- HeinOnline.org Skip to main content
Content Start

Click here to view short-term subscription options to access this document.

22 Nat'l L. Sch. India Rev. 1 (2010)
The Role of Foreign Precedents in a Country's Legal System

handle is hein.journals/nlsind22 and id is 1 raw text is: ARTICLES

Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan*
The use offoreign judgments in domestic constitutional adjudication has proved
to becontentious in both the USA and India. ChiefJustice Balakrishnan argues
that there is no principle of law that constrains a constitutional court from
referring to these judgments, and specifically addresses possible differences in
the constitutional scheme in the United States and India in this respect. Chief
Justice Balakrishnan emphasises, however, that this exercise must proceed with
caution, and carefully examine structural similarities before applying the decision
of a foreign court to a domestic question. He offers several examples in the
jurisprudence ofthe Supreme Court ofIndia that could serve as a model for the
use offoreign judgments in constitutional adjudication.
The topic that I am addressing has been very contentious amongst the legal
community in the United States. Sitting justices of the United States Supreme
Court as well as eminent academics have taken strong positions to justify or
oppose the citation of foreign precedents in constitutional cases. As a representative
of the Indian judicial system, the most appropriate thing for me to do is to present
an 'outsider's view' of this debate and then briefly comment on how foreign
precedents have been treated by the higher judiciary in India.
At the outset, it must be clarified that reliance on foreign precedents is
necessary in certain categories of appellate litigation and adjudication. For instance,
in litigation pertaining to cross-border business dealings as well as family-related
disputes, the actual location of the parties in different jurisdictions makes it
necessary to cite and discuss foreign statutory laws and decisions. Hence, domestic
1   This is based on a lecture delivered by Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.G. Balakrishnan at the
Northwestern University School of Law (Illinois, U.S.A.) on October 28, 2008.
* Presently serving as the Chief Justice of India (January 2007 onwards) at the
Supreme Court of India, New Delhi. The author acknowledges the research
assistance provided by Sidharth Chauhan (Law Clerk to the Hon'ble C.J.I.).


Already a Subscriber?

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is the world’s largest image-based and fully searchable legal and academic research database. Material contained in HeinOnline is an exact replication of the original printed product, and coverage is typically comprehensive. Contact us today for a free demo of this incredible resource.

We offer annual subscriptions to all HeinOnline collections to universities, colleges, law firms, individuals, and other institutions. To request a quote or trial, please click here.

Please note: the content in the Law Journal Library is constantly changing and some content has restrictions as required per the license. Therefore, please review the available content via the following link to ensure the material you wish to access is included in the database. For a complete list of content included in the Law Journal Library, please click here.

Learn More About the Law Journal Library (pdf)
Back To Top Jump To Bottom