About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

7 Melb. J. Int'l L. 185 (2006)
Reconceiving the UN Human Rights Regime: Challenges Confronting the New UN Human Rights Council

handle is hein.journals/meljil7 and id is 189 raw text is: 




                                   FEATURE

    RECONCEIVING THE UN HUMAN RIGHTS REGIME:
            CHALLENGES CONFRONTING THE NEW
                    UN   HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL

                                  PHILIP ALSTON*


[In 2006, the UN Commission on Human Rights, established 60 years earlier, was replaced by a
new Human   Rights Council. This article examines the widely differing reasons given for the
Commission 's loss of credibility and seeks to draw lessons relevant to the new institutional
regime which the Council must build It argues that the preoccupation with the Council's
composition, and the exclusion of violators, fails to address the more important factors in the
Commission 's downfall. Detailed consideration is given to the potential strengths and pitfalls
involved in establishing a system of universal periodic review of the human rights performance of
every state, and of the need to learn from the dismal failure of a very similar exercise undertaken
by the Commission between 1956 and 1981. The article then considers some of the key reforms
that need to be undertaken in order to transform the system of 'special procedures' - currently
involving some 41 country and thematic mechanisms - into a more coherent, professional and
effective system for defending human rights and one which should be at the core of the work of
the new Council.]

                                     CONTENTS

I    Introduction .............................................................................. 186
II   The Commission's   Fall from Grace ................................................... 187
III  Who  Belongs?  The Composition  of the Commission on Human   Rights and the
     Human   Rights Council.................................................................. 188
        A    The Historical Dimension...................................................... 189
        B   The  Feasibility of Various Criteria for Membership....................... 191
               1    The Emergence  of Membership  as the Key Concern  ............. 191
               2    The Quest to Identify Criteria for Membership.................... 193
               3    Universality in Place of Selective Criteria......................... 196
        C    The Compromise   on Council Membership................................... 198
               1    Individual Election..................................................... 198
               2    Electoral Majority ..................................................... 199
               3    Term  Limits ............................................................ 199
               4    Pledges..................................................................200
               5    Membership  Suspension ..............................................201


   *John Norton  Pomeroy Professor of Law, Faculty Director of New York University Law
     School's Center for Human  Rights and Global  Justice, and United Nations Special
     Rapporteur on Extrajudicial Summary or Arbitrary Executions. This article is based upon
     the lecture given as the 24' Allen Hope Southey Memorial Lecture at the University of
     Melbourne in September 2005. I am deeply grateful to Dean Michael Crommelin, Professor
     Anne Orford, John Tobin and other faculty members for their very warm hospitality during
     my visit to the Law School. I would also like to acknowledge the contribution of the
     members of the Melbourne Journal of International Law Editorial Board who assisted with
     the editing of this article. At the time of writing I am the Chairperson of the Coordination
     Committee established to facilitate and promote the work of the 41 Special Procedures
     which report to the UN Commission on Human Rights. The comments in this paper do not
     constitute those of the Committee and do not necessarily reflect the views of the other
     mandate-holders represented in that Committee.


185

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most