About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

79 Medico-Legal J. 1 (2011)

handle is hein.journals/medlgjr79 and id is 1 raw text is: 

Medico-Legal Journal (2011) Vol. 79 Part 1, 1 2. DOI: 10.1258/mlj.2011.011006
( Medico-Legal Society 2011


                                            EDITORIAL


Breast Cancer: Does Universal Screening

Do More Harm Than Good? Discuss


Diana Brahams
Editor


When I was a child and even a young and
not-so-young adult, cancer was not a topic that
many people were keen to discuss and few people vol-
unteered that they or their relatives had been diagnosed
with it. It was often kept secret even after death as if it
was contagious like the plague. A good example of
this lies in the d6nouement of Daphne Du Maurier's
novel Rebecca. The prognosis for most cancers was
grim as were the treatments (and they're not a walk
in the park today, either). However, in more recent
years there has been a huge shift to make this and
other killer diseases (e.g. AIDS) acceptable for
general conversation and debate.
  It is surgeons and researchers like Professor
Michael Baum who have successfully wrought a
positive shift in patients' and doctors' attitudes to
dealing with cancer. In his book, Breast Beating (a
personal odyssey in the quest for an understanding
of breast cancer, the meaning of life and other easy
questions)' Baum explains that it was his mother's
death from (ineffectively and horribly treated) breast
cancer which prompted him to shift his career to
search for better, scientifically proven methods of
diagnosis and treatment of the disease and to adopt
rigorous standards of critical analysis (whether
counter-intuitive or against his own practices or
unproven therapies that sound good to the ear) for
the rest of his life.
  As a result of the work of Professor Baum and
many other dedicated colleagues, the mutilating,
crippling and painful breast surgery that was once
the norm has been proven excessive in all but a
tiny minority of cases. Always a champion for a
cause he believes to be fair and right, Professor
Baum will provide expert advice where there is a
possible legal claim for compensation. He is never


afraid to say No. No, there is no negligence and/or
no there is no case to be made on causation albeit
there has been delay and practice falls short of
ideal; it can be difficult to prove that the patient has
lost a greater than 50%  chance of a significantly
better outcome.
  And what about the medico-legal case for univer-
sal screening for breast cancer? Does earlier detection
of abnormalities in the breast really increase life-
expectancy and reduce morbidity in most patients?
Baum does not think so though he was once a keen
supporter of screening, and in 1987 after the Forrest
Report was published, he was commissioned by the
Department of Health to set up the first screening
unit and training centre in London. However, he
soon became sceptical and increasingly convinced
that any benefits from universal screening were out-
weighed   by  over-diagnosis, which   resulted in
unnecessary surgery and other treatments given to
healthy women. In 1997 he resigned from the NHS
Breast Screening Programme (BSP) in disgust at
the way women were being coerced into screening.
  In February 2009 there was more evidence that
general mammographic screening caused harm (and
a rise in mastectomies) in a paper published in the
British Medical Journal by the independent Nordic
                 2
Cochrane Centre. Contemporaneously, Baum     and
27 other experts wrote to The Times (19 February
2009) explaining the problems and arguing that the
dramatic decline in mortality from breast cancer is
as equally likely to be due to better treatments as to
earlier detection by screening. The letter continued
... there are harms associated with early detection
of breast cancer by screening that are not widely
acknowledged. For example, there is evidence to
show that up to half of all cancers and their precursor

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most