About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

7 Medico-Legal & Criminological Rev. 1 (1939)

handle is hein.journals/medlgjr7 and id is 1 raw text is: 



THE MEDICO-LEGAL

         AND CRIMINOLOGICAL


                   REVIEW


Vol. VII.             January, 1939                   No. i


               COMMON GROUND
   Under this heading the Editors comment on matters of interest to both
                          professions.

                 SHOULD A DOCTOR TELL ?
THE question whether a doctor who has attended a woman dying as
a result of a criminal abortion shall communicate with the police
the information she has given him in professional confidence is an old
and familiar one. In December, 1914, Mr. Justice Avory, charging
the grand jury in a case against an abortionist, said that when a
woman was likely to die and her evidence likely to be lost, it was the
doctor's duty to communicate with the police, and that his desire
to preserve professional confidence must be subordinated to the duty
which rests upon every good citizen to assist in the investigation of a
serious crime. This dictum is constantly quoted, and the organized
medical profession profoundly disagree with it. It has never ac-
quired the force of law, and no attempt has ever been made-so far
as we know-to suggest in court that it has. The controversy was
revived in the court of Mr. Ingleby Oddie, the Paddington coroner,
on November 7.* His inquest on a woman who died from blood
poisoning following abortion showed that a medical practitioner
had been called to the woman, that she had told him she had had an
illegal abortion, and that he had sent her to hospital. He asked a
solicitor if he should report to the police what she had said, and the
solicitor told him it was not his duty to do so. The coroner did not
blame the doctor for his action, although, as he said, if the doctor
had warned the authorities that a felony had been committed, a
valuable dying declaration might have been taken. He expressed
                  * The Times, November 8, 1938.
  VOL. VII. I                                          I

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most