About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

50 Medico-Legal J. 3 (1982)

handle is hein.journals/medlgjr50 and id is 1 raw text is: 



   THE MEDICO-LEGAL


                    JOURNAL
                            Founded 1901


 1982                         Vol. L                   Part One



                           EDITORIAL
                REGINA V. DR. LEONARD ARTHUR

As we go to press we see that the Attorney General is considering referring to the
Court of Appeal on a point of law the case of Dr. Arthur. The purpose of the
reference would be to determine whether the trial Judge had been correct in ruling
that to prescribe nursing care only could not be attempted murder. Whatever may
be the outcome of this reconsideration, and however it may influence any future
legal proceedings, it will perhaps not disturb the fundamental points which were
highlighted by the trial.
  The most fundamental point was doubtless that whatever the law and the
lawyers may say, the average man or woman who finds himself or herself sitting
on a jury can see a clear distinction between the activities of the Yorkshire Ripper
and those of Dr. Arthur. Amongst such jury persons there will doubtless always
be a variation of opinion as regards the non-treatment of neonates with severe
physical or mental handicaps. There will also in the vast majority be a tolerance
for the views of others and an understanding that rigid rules could not be expected
to result in universal benefit.
  The case did of course give great opportunities for the dissemination of the views
of extremists and self-appointed experts. The organisation 'Life' which reported
Dr. Arthur to the police will doubtless continue to seek to impose its views on
Society regardless of the Court's decision, and its hospital 'moles' will continue
their activities. The public has been inundated with anecdotal reports of single
cases of brain damaged children with the implied suggestion that each one
represents the average. A single case in the family would seem to be thought by
some to confer instant expert status regarding all aspects of the matter upon the
parents.
  Media coverage was perhaps inevitably selective. One television interview spoke
of the joy the handicapped child had brought to the family and mentioned without
emphasis that the child only came home at the weekends. Very little was seen of
those children who not only do not come home for weekends, but who cease to
be visited and whose very existence is scarcely acknowledged. Very little was said
of the finite resources of the National Health Service when it comes to care for
such children, of the shortcomings of accommodation, or of the difficulties of
finding staff of suitable calibre for a most demanding and self-sacrificing task.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most