About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

32 Medico-Legal J. 1 (1964)

handle is hein.journals/medlgjr32 and id is 1 raw text is: 


                                EDUIORIAL

                                  MORTUARIES
A LOCAL health authority or parish council in England and Wales is required to
provide mortuary accommodation, which responsibility may be shared with adjacent
authorities. In London combination of boroughs has in some places brought about
the provision of up-to-date well equipped buildings, the most recent being a particu-
larly fine mortuary and Coroner's court at Southwark, which is well worth a visit.
Under the London Government Act mortuary powers have been left in the hands
of the boroughs and it is to be hoped that consultation with neighbours, and with
the coroners and pathologists concerned, will precede any projected change in
mortuary provision. The number of deaths reported to coroners in a year is now
ioo,ooo and in London ii,ooo or 12,000. Most of these reports result in autopsy
in a public mortuary.
    Originally mortuaries were merely dead houses for the deposit of corpses found
drowned or in crowded homes but rapid development of forensic medicine has altered
this primitive function. The modem mortuary provides for both storage and post-
mortem examination. In rural areas the storage function is still important but in
London this has so dwindled that in one mortuary serving four boroughs fewer than
I% accommodation cases are received in a year.
   Attention must therefore be focused on the medico-legal aspect of the public
mortuary. Until 1956 few local authorities paid much attention to their mortuaries
and many were in a deplorable condition. They were sited in graveyards, council
yards and back streets, they lacked refrigeration or proper lighting; many did not
have running water. In 1956 the Ministry of Housing and Local Government
issued a bulletin Planning of Mortuaries and Post-mortem Accommodation which
suggested minimum standards for construction and amenity. It mentions that
relatives who come to see bodies are entitled to decent surroundings and waiting
accommodation and to proper viewing facilities. Since this time conditions have
improved although many mortuaries, even in London, still leave much to be desired.
    In less densely populated urbanized areas adequate facilities are still essential,
although there is less opportunity for combination between neighbouring authorities.
In many larger country towns coroners' post-mortem examinations are done in
hospital mortuaries. There is no objection in principle to this and saving may come
from avoiding duplication of arrangements. If hospital accommodation is used for
homicide cases, or those raising important considerations of civil liability, there
should be a private post-mortem room and refrigerator which can be locked against
unauthorized entry: in a busy public mortuary similar provision is desirable.
   In remote and sparsely populated districts choice lies between transport of bodies
over long distances and the acceptance of a lower standard of mortuary. It may be
necessary in places to face these lower standards.
   An equally pressing need is for the extension of toxicological services. The
Home Office forensic science laboratories, supplemented by practising pathologists,
provide these at present but both of these agencies are grossly overworked. The
addition of laboratories staffed by technicians under the supervision of scientific
officers should be considered when new larger mortuaries are built. These would
serve the coroners' cases and help to ease pressure on the scientific laboratories,
particularly in carrying out such frequently performed estimations as urine alcohols
in motoring cases. Whether these could come under the Home Office aegis, and
whether suitable staff could be recruited, is a matter for exploration. The time has
come for more readily available toxicological examinations, a development which
could well be included as part of the mortuary services.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most