About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

20 Med., Health Care & Phil. 1 (2017)

handle is hein.journals/medhcph20 and id is 1 raw text is: Med Health Care and Philos (2017) 20:1-2 DOI 10.1007/s11019-017-9756-3 EDITORIAL Emerging technologies and the voice of reason Bert Gordijnl - Henk ten Have2 Published online: 8 February 2017 © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017 In the early days of nanoethics the debate was dominated by grand visions of the manifold blessings that would be bestowed upon us, if only nanotechnology were developed to the full. Simultaneously, however, there were equally vociferous prophecies of doom and gloom caused by self- replicating and all-devouring nanobots. At the time one of the editors of the journal at hand called for the voice of reason in a paper pointing out the need for more balanced ethical assessments better informed by what is actually going on in specific fields of nanotechnological research (Gordijn 2005, 527). Two years later, John Weckert started a new journal entitled Nanoethics. Ethics for Technologies that Converge at the Nanoscale in an endeavor to advance the examination of ethical and social issues surrounding nanotechnologies in a philosophically rigorous and scientif- ically informed manner (Weckert 2007, 2). In subsequent years the debate made a lot of progress to the effect that we are now seeing interesting and well-informed analyses of particular application domains of nanotechnology. The first paper in this issue is a case in point (Allon et al. 2017). Reflecting on the development of nanoethics two questions come to mind. Hype How come reasonable and balanced ethical analyses do rarely pop up in early stage debates about emerging tech- nologies? Upheaval and exaggeration do not seem to be E Bert Gordijn bert.gordijn@dcu.ie Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland 2 Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, USA isolated phenomena particular to nanoethics but rather spectacles that can be observed time and again, e.g. in debates about geoengineering, synthetic biology, enhance- ment, artificial intelligence and in vitro meat. Why all the hyperboles and hysteria whenever a new technology catches the attention of ethicists? Unquestionably, solid information on morally relevant features of any new tech- nology is hard to come by in its early developmental stages. Collingridge (1982) famously describes the following dilemma: when we can still influence the course of a new technology, we lack sufficient knowledge about its effects; however, when we have enough information, the technol- ogy is so rooted in society that we are no longer able to sig- nificantly shape its development. And yet, can the lack of information by itself account for the commotion and exag- gerations on both sides of the ethical debate? Or are there additional factors at work? What are the mechanisms caus- ing the idiosyncratic, often emotionally heated dialectic of these early stage debates? Uniqueness In the last section of their paper, Allon et al. (2017) touch on the question of the uniqueness of nanomedicine. Dis- tinctiveness is an issue that seems to pop up a lot when dealing with a new technology: 'Does the technology pose any new ethical questions?' is a question often asked. How- ever, it is not immediately clear whether such a question is very meaningful, given that it seems to be a predominantly semantic quandary (cf. Gordijn and Cutter 2014)? To illus- trate this point: Does it make sense to ask whether the iPhone7 is unique; is it meaningful 'philosophically' - and not just for the purpose of advertising? Does the answer to the question not simply depend on the level of abstraction I_) Springer CrossMark

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most