About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

37 Loy. L. A. L. Rev. 1 (2003-2004)
The Myth of the Liberal Ninth Circuit

handle is hein.journals/lla37 and id is 41 raw text is: THE MYTH OF THE LIBERAL
NINTH CIRCUIT
Erwin Chemerinsky*
The popular image of the Ninth Circuit, often expressed in the
news media, is that it is a far left court that is reversed more often
than any other circuit in the country.' This is simply wrong. In the
October 2002 Term, the Supreme Court reversed the lower court in
2
seventy-four percent of all of the cases it decided.  The Supreme
Court reversed the Ninth Circuit in seventy-five percent of the cases
coming from that court.3 The year before, during the October 2001
Term, the statistics were almost identical:   the Supreme Court
reversed the lower courts seventy-five percent of the time and the
Ninth Circuit was reversed seventy-six percent of the time.4 Among
all federal circuits, the Ninth Circuit is almost exactly at the median
among circuits in reversal rates.
During the October 2002 Term, some of the Supreme Court's
most important decisions affirmed the Ninth Circuit. For instance, in
Brown v. Legal Foundation of Washington,5 the Supreme Court
* Sydney M. Irmas Professor of Public Interest Law, Legal Ethics, and
Political Science, University of Southern California. I want to thank Diidri
Wells and Annika Martin for their excellent research assistance. It should be
disclosed that I was co-counsel before the Ninth Circuit in some of the cases
discussed in this article, including Lockyer v. Andrade, 123 S. Ct. 1166 (2003),
Coalition of Clergy v. Bush, 310 F.3d 1153 (9th Cir. 2002), and Southwest
Voter Registration Educ. Project v. Shelley, No. 03-56498, 2003 WL
22175955 (9th Cir. Sept. 23, 2003).
1. See, e.g., Charlotte Allen, Pledge of Allegiance; Under God: An
'Injury' with Almost No Victims, L.A. TIMES, Oct. 5, 2003, at M3 (The 9th
Circuit is famous for its loopy, ultra-liberal rulings that run against the grain of
other federal courts and are often overturned by the Supreme Court.).
2. See Marcia Coyle, 2002-2003 Term: Supreme Court Review, NAT'L
L.J., Aug. 4, 2003, at S 1.
3. See id
4. See Marcia Coyle, 2001-2002 Term: Supreme Court Review, NAT'L
L.J., Aug. 5, 2002, at C1.
5. 123 S. Ct. 1406 (2003).

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most