About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 Lakehead L.J. 1 (2015-2016)

handle is hein.journals/lkdlj1 and id is 1 raw text is: 





                            CO-EDITORS' NOTE


    We are delighted to present the inaugural volume of the Lakehead Law Journal! Our goal
is to produce a topical, innovative, and practical publication. The objectives of the Lakehead
Law  Journal correspond to those of the Bora Laskin Faculty of Law at Lakehead University.
These objectives include:

    1. publishing analysis and critical commentary on legal issues facing Indigenous nations;

    2. promoting  discussion and debate amongst students, practitioners, and academics on
       rural, northern, and small firm legal practice; and,

    3.  disseminating legal research that is grounded in our region by focusing on natural
       resource and environmental law.

    The four articles that constitute our first volume fulfill these objectives well.

    In Statutory Limitation of Aboriginal or Treaty Rights: What Counts as Justification?,
Peter Hogg and Daniel Styler provide invaluable guidance on the justification test at the
fourth step of the Sparrow analysis for assessing Aboriginal rights pursuant to section 35(1)
of the Constitution Act, 1982. If met, the justification test allows the Crown to infringe
constitutionally protected Aboriginal rights. As Hogg and Styler observe, the Supreme Court
of Canada has not yet released a decision applying each step of the justification test and
concluding that the infringement is justified. Given this dearth of direction from our highest
Court, Hogg and  Styler collect the Court's dicta on the topic and produce an insightful analysis
demonstrating what an application of the justification test could look like in practice.

    Hadley Friedland and Val Napoleon provide a comprehensive account of their
methodology  for identifying, articulating, and revitalizing Indigenous laws in Gathering
the Threads: Developing a Methodology for Researching and Rebuilding Indigenous Legal
Traditions. They applied this methodology in their Accessing Justice and Reconciliation
Project, which examined the ways in which seven Indigenous societies across Canada employ
their own laws to manage harms and conflict. Their account includes a detailed description
of their use of the common law case brief model to draw out legal principles from Indigenous
stories. Friedland and Napoleon also advance the dialogue on this topic by addressing
concerns, expressed by other scholars, about their methodology. This article will serve as a vital
resource to researchers engaged in rebuilding Indigenous legal traditions, and to instructors
who  want to give students the capacity to treat Indigenous law as law.

    In our final peer-reviewed article, Daniel Dylan provides an interesting and insightful
overview on issues relating to the duty to consult. In his paper,  The Duty to Consult on
Wildlife Matters in Overlapping Northern Land Claims Agreements, Dylan examines
what he describes as a separate and unique duty to consult imposed on beneficiaries of
overlapping land settlement areas particularly in relation to the shared wildlife. Dylan uses
the Foxe Basin and its harvest quotas to contextualize his argument. This article thoroughly
canvasses the relevant land claim agreements and seeks to identify the content of this separate
and unique duty.

    The final article in this volume, The Past, Present and Future of Canadian Environmental
Law: A  Critical Dialogue is an innovative interview piece. The Lakehead Law Journal

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most