About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

4 Lentera Hukum 1 (2017)

handle is hein.journals/lenth4 and id is 1 raw text is: Lentera Huhum, Volume 4 Issue 1 (2017), pp. 1-18 ISSN 2355-4673 https://doi.org/10.19184/ ejlh.v4i1.5267 Published by the University of Jember, Indonesia Available online 22 April 2017 Rekonseptualisasi Seleksi Hakim Konstitusi sebagai Upaya Mewujudkan H akim Konstitusi yang Berkualifikasi Indramayu University of Jember, Indonesia Indramayu.fh@gmai.com Jayus University of Jember, Indonesia dr.jayus56.fh@unej.ac.id Rosita Indrayati University of Jember, Indonesia rosita.indrayati@yahoo.com ABSTRACT Integrity, good character, justice, and expert statesman of the constitution as the indicators to appoint Constitutional Judge should be taken into account by the Supreme Court, the House, and the President in the selection process. The cases of corruption named Akil Mochtar and Patrialis Akbar as the convicted and the suspected persons respectively should be regarded as an appropriate opportunity to evaluate law relating to the Constitutional Judges selection process in which it is not clearly defined in the Constitutional Court Act. To date, the law relating to selection is given to respective institutions where the Supreme Court takes the selection internally with no transparency, the House only requires to write and present article, and in some cases the President prefers to appoint with no adequate criteria. The article uses doctrinal research in addressing the case related to the current regulation on constitutional judge selection. It concludes that the Supreme Court, the House and the President ignore the principles of transparency, participatory, objectivity, and accountability in the selection, including the possibility of resulting unqualified judge. The selection needs reconceptualization comprising the establishment of expert panel, unaffiliated candidate to a political party, and reconcept of selection mechanism. KEYWORDS: Reconceptualization, Selection, Constitutional Judge. n ;Copyright © 2017 by Author(s) CCThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. All writings published in this journal are personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. HOW TO CITE: Indramayu,Jayus & Rosita Indrayati. Rekonseptualisasi Seleksi Hakim Konstitusi sebagai Upaya Mewujudkan Hakim Konstitusi yang Berkualitas (2017) 4:1 Lentera Hukum 1-18. Submitted: August 24, 2017 Revised: August 24, 2017 Accepted: October 12, 2017

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most