About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

15 Law & Bus. Rev. Am. 7 (2009)
A Short History of the Washington Consensus

handle is hein.journals/lbramrca15 and id is 9 raw text is: A SHORT HISTORY OF THE WASHINGTON CONSENSUS' John Williamson* I. INTRODUCTION HE term Washington Consensus was coined in 1989. The first written usage was in my background paper for a conference that the Institute for International Economics convened in order to ex- amine the extent to which the old ideas of development economics that had governed Latin American economic policy since the 1950s were be- ing swept aside by the set of ideas that had long been accepted as appro- priate within the OECD. In order to try and ensure that the background papers for that conference dealt with a common set of issues, I made a list of ten policies that I thought more or less everyone in Washington would agree were needed more or less everywhere in Latin America, and la- beled this the Washington Consensus. Little did it occur to me that fifteen years later I would be asked to write about the history of a term that had become the center of fierce ideological controversy. The first section of this paper describes what I recollect about the back- ground to my background paper for the 1989 conference. The second section retraces much more familiar ground, summarizing the ten points that I included in the Washington Consensus. This is followed by an ac- count of the reception given to the term, and the analysis. The next sec- tion tries to account for the fact that the term became used in such different ways in different quarters and thus to be at the center of ideo- logical controversies. The last substantive section is forward-looking and describes what I believe needs to be added to my original list in order to formulate a policy agenda for Latin America today. BACKGROUND The story started in the Spring of 1989 when I was testifying before a Congressional committee in favor of the Brady Plan. I argued that it * Senior Fellow, Institute for International Economics 1. Paper commissioned by Fundaci6n CIDOB for a conference From the Washing- ton Consensus towards a new Global Governance, Barcelona, September 24-25, 2004. The paper is reprinted with the permission of the Peter G. Peterson Institute for International Economics which owns the copyright rights of all of its fellows. The institute is a private, nonpartisan, institution devoted to the study of economic policy and is one of the only economic think tanks considered to be nonpartisan by the press and neutral by the U.S. Congress.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most