About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

41 JREG Bulletin 1 (2023)

handle is hein.journals/jregb41 and id is 1 raw text is: 










Profiting from Pollution


Nathan  Atkinsont





    This  Article presents original results from   a large-scale study  of
environmental   violations. I use  the universe  of  civil Clean Air  Act
environmental   violations by stationary emitters of pollution to  test the
effectiveness of EPA  enforcement. Using  conservative assumptions, I find
that in 36%  of cases, it is profitable for firms to violate the Clean Air Act,
even  after paying fines. Importantly, the profitability of noncompliance is
increasing in the size of the violation, such that almost every large violation
of the Clean  Air Act  is profitable. In aggregate, I estimate that penalties
imposed  by the EPA  would have to be four times greater than those imposed
to achieve the EPA's  stated policy goal of removing the economic benefits
of noncompliance.  In every case of profitable noncompliance, the EPA had
statutory authority to impose  a larger penalty, and official EPA policies
called for a larger penalty. I further find that the most profitable violations
are also the most harmful to the environment in terms of net emissions. My
study suggests that some firms have little financial incentive to comply with
the Clean Air Act and suggests that if the EPA were to comply with its own
policies, this effect would be mitigated.

Introduction.................................................................................................. 2
I. Legal and Institutional Background ...........................................................6
       A. Calculation of the cost of complying on time .......................... 9
       B. Calculation of the cost of not complying on time ......................10
       C. Calculation of the Initial Economic Benefit ..........................11
       D. Calculation of current Economic  Benefit..............................11
II. Analysis.......................................................................................................12
       A. Data  and Empirical Strategy......................................................12
       B. ASARCO Example ....................................................................14


t University of Wisconsin. Thank you to Abhay Aneja, Eric Shaeffer, Alexander Stremitzer, Steph
Tai, and seminar participants at the ETH Zurich, George Mason University, Northwestern
Pritzker School of Law, Marquette School of Law, Oxford Faculty of Law, University of Western
Ontario School of Law, and UC Berkeley College of Law for helpful comments and discussions.
Thank you to the editors at JREG for excellent work. Contact: natkinson@wisc.edu. This paper
previously circulated under the title Do Corporations Profit from Breaking the Law? Evidence
from  Environmental Violations. Replication  files are  available  at https://www
.nathanatkinson.com.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most