About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 Int'l J.L. Built Env't 9 (2009)

handle is hein.journals/jppel1 and id is 1 raw text is: The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at
www.emeraldinsight.com/1756-1450.htm

International comparative
analysis of building regulations:
an analytical tool
Jeroen van der Heijden
OTB Research Institute for Housing, Urban, and Mobility Studies,
Deft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to introduce a tool for the international comparative analysis
of regulatory regimes in the field of building regulation.
Design/methodology/approach - On the basis of a heuristic model drawn from regulatory
literature, a typology of building regulatory regimes is introduced. Each type is illustrated with a
number of real-life examples from North America, Europe, and Australia.
Findings - Governments worldwide have introduced building regulatory regimes with a variety of
designs. On an abstract level, these designs are shown to have a comparable pattern. This pattern is
utilised to draw up a typology of regime-designs that can be placed on a sliding scale, with a pure
public regime at the one end and a pure private regime at the other. Intermediate regimes display
characteristics of both.
Originality/value - The comparative analysis of different regimes assists policy makers by
demonstrating which combinations of regulatory characteristics can provide the best results in
particular instances. The typology introduced by the paper assists this process by providing a tool for
systematic analysis of complex real-life cases.
Keywords Buildings, Technical regulations, Specifications
Paper type Conceptual paper
Introduction
Contemporary building regulations in developed countries have their origins in the
nineteenth century, when changes in society due to the industrial revolution provided
governments with reason to become increasingly involved in the building industry
(see, for instance, the development of early building regulations in England: Ash
and Ash, 1899; Emden, 1885; France: Risler, 1915; the USA: Gould, 1895; and
The Netherlands: Kocken, 2004; van der Heijden et al., 2007). These changes included
the urgent demand for housing for a growing number of immigrants, and the discovery
of the relationship between insanitary conditions and public health. Since the
nineteenth century, those regulations have been adapted to suit contemporary needs
and, globally, current building regulations cover a broad range of topics, including
This paper is based on Chapter 4 of the doctorate thesis Building regulatory enforcement
regimes. Comparative analysis of private sector involvement in the enforcement of public
building regulations. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 2007 ENHR
Conference in Rotterdam, The Netherlands. The author has discussed early drafts of this paper
with Andre Thomsen, Jitske de Jong, Neil Gunningham, Peter May and William Baer. The author
is grateful for their advice and observations. The author also wishes to thank two anonymous
reviewers of this journal for their valuable comments.

Analysis
of building
regulations
9

International Journal of Law in the
Built Environment
Vol. 1 No. 1, 2009
pp. 9-25
© Emerald Group Publishing Limited
1756-1450
DOI 10.1105/17561450910950223

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most