About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

6 J. Mgmt. & Sustainability 1 (2016)

handle is hein.journals/jms6 and id is 1 raw text is: 


                                                     Journal of Management and Sustainability; Vol. 6, No. 1; 2016
                                                                           ISSN 1925-4725 E-ISSN 1925-4733
                                                          Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education


                     Sustainable Evolution for Global Business:

                          A Synthetic Review of the Literature

                                               S. J. Chang'
'Illinois State University, USA

Correspondence: S. J. Chang, Illinois State University, USA. E-mail: sjchang ttilstu.edu


Received: October 3, 2015      Accepted: December 21, 2015  Online Published: February 25, 2016
doi: 10.5539/jms.v6nlpl   URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jms.v6nlpl


Abstract
This paper reviews the recent literature on business sustainability. While it is almost impossible to give a
universally agreeable definition of sustainability due to its scope, depth, and inclusive nature, this paper
reviews a fairly large set of research efforts, both empirical and normative, that examine the sustainability issue
in regards to the theoretical development, the interface between business and society, the interrelationships
among firms, markets, and the public interest, sustainability measurement and assessment, as well as the changes,
developments, and evolution in recent years along those lines. The uniqueness of the study is to review the
literature by following the developmental and evolutionary sequences in business sustainability in order to shed
light on how the concept of corporate sustainability has evolved from the traditional shareholders-focused
neoclassical view and how it is advanced from the ideas of environmentalism, stakeholder theory, and CSR.
Keywords: business ethics, corporate social responsibility, stakeholder theory, sustainability, sustainable
evolution
1. Introduction
Ever since it was first introduced by the Sierra Club in the 1970s, the term sustainability has been used in
various areas with various meanings, and today it is probably one of the most overused buzzwords in business
lexicon. When the term is mentioned, oftentimes other related buzzwords are also spoken, such as corporate
social responsibility (CSR), environmentalism, stakeholder theory or stakeholderism, triple bottom line (TBL),
green business, 3-P (people, planet, and profits) business, socially responsible investing (SRI), corporate
citizenship, ecopreneur, natural capitalism, sustainable value added (SVA), and so forth. With growing concerns
over the long-run welfare of diverse corporate stakeholders, these phrases are increasingly superseded by the
broader term, corporate sustainability.
Thanks to continuous expansion and proliferation of global business, today people, capital, information, and
technology travel more freely, rapidly, and widely than ever, and thus impact the society more widely and deeply
than ever. In this rapidly changing environment, global businesses act as evolutionary change agents for the
creation of a sustainable global civilization (Laszlo, 2001; Van Marrewijk, 2003; Benn, Dunphy, & Griffiths,
2006; Dunphy, Griffiths, & Benn, 2007; Visser & Crane, 2010; Hoffman, Badiane, & Haigh, 2012). In 1987
Our Common Future, the so called Brundtland Commission Report by the World Commission on Environment
and Development (1987) formally described sustainable development as development that meets the needs of
the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.
Within more academic management circles, Elkington (1994) proposed the concept of the triple bottom line
(TBL) based on the idea that business goals are inseparable from the society and environment, which is
essentially consistent with the corporate sustainability concept. Hawken, Lovins, & Lovins (1999) suggested the
idea of natural capitalism where proper design and conceptualization of products and services can produce better
results with minimal negative impact upon the environment. Dyllick & Hockerts (2002) also offer three types of
capital-economic, natural, and social-in line with TBL and corporate sustainability.
Considering all the discussions transpired over the years, we may define corporate sustainability as an inclusive
concept that encompasses a variety of social impact issues such as environmental protection, social justice,
business ethics, governance, product safety, employee welfare, diversity, and community well-being. In a world
of increased demand for social welfare, on the rise is a strong normative proposition that sustainability should be

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most