About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

28 J. Legal Stud. Educ. [v] (2011)

handle is hein.journals/jlse28 and id is 1 raw text is: 








Editor's Corner: Civility in the

Classroom

In this issue's first article, Professors Lorrie Willey and Debra Burke  de-
scribe a classroom  exercise in which teams  of students in a business ethics
course  work to develop  a Student Code   of Professional Conduct. Students
thereby  are  encouraged   to reflect on the business  world's  expectations
regarding   ethical behavior  and  professionalism.  The  article includes a
model  code  developed  by students, which, among  other standards,  calls for
students  to behave civilly and with respect for the opinions of others.
      This article prompted  me  to think about expectations  for the behav-
ior  of professors. What   would   be  included  in  a Professor's  Code  of
Professional  Conduct,  especially with regard  to professors' dealings with
students?  The  Statement  on  Professional Ethics drafted by the American
Association  of University Professors  (AAUP)1   serves as a useful  starting
point. In part, this statement provides: As teachers, professors encourage
the free pursuit  of learning in their students. ... Professors demonstrate
respect for students as individuals and  adhere  to their proper roles as in-
tellectual guides and counselors.2
      Two   leading  scholars on  professorial  misconduct,3   Braxton  and
Bayer,  propose   a more   specific Code  of Conduct   for Undergraduate



'Am. Ass'n Univ. Professors, Statement on Professional Ethics (2009), http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/
pubres/policydocs/contents/statementonprofessionalethics.htm.
2Id.

3This is a topic that has attracted increased attention in recent years. See, e.g., Special Issue,
Addressing Faculty and Student Classroom Improprieties, 99 NEw DIRECTIONS FOR TEACHING &
LEARNING 3-106 (2004). Improprieties, of course, may also be perpetrated by students. Dis-
cussion abounds on such student improprieties as violence, rudeness, or cheating. While some
student misconduct poses a serious threat either to physical safety or to academic integrity,
readers may be amused by a recent alleged incident, recounted at Rabbit-Fearing Teacher Loses
Out (July 20, 2010), http://www.news24.com/World/News/Rabbit-fearing-teacher-loses-out-
20100720 (concerning a lawsuit brought by a teacher with an alleged paralysing fear of
rabbits against a student who allegedly torment[ed] her by scrawling pictures of rabbits on
the blackboard). For an interesting recent study on causes of student incivility, see Bruce R.
Elder et al., Lost in a Crowd: Anonymity and Incivility in the Accounting Classroom, 20 AcCT. ED-
UCATORS' J. 91 (2010) (surveying the literature, reporting results of study suggesting that student
anonymity increases student incivility, and proposing methods for reducing anonymity). For
0  2011 The Author
Journal of Legal Studies Education 0 2011 Academy of Legal Studies in Business
                                      v

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most