About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

38 J.L. & Pol. 1 (2023)

handle is hein.journals/jlp38 and id is 1 raw text is: 











      JUSTICIABILITY AS A CANON OF AVOIDANCE AND A
        NORMATIVE GOOD IN WAR POWERS LITIGATION
                           Gregory   V Momjian

                               INTRODUCTION

   On  September   29, 2021, a group of bipartisan congresspeople  led by Jim
McGovern (D, MA) and former congressman Peter Meijer (R, Michigan)
introduced  H.R.  5410: The  National  Security Reforms  and  Accountability
Act  (NSRAA).' If passed, the NSRAA would be the first significant
amendment to   the 1973  War  Powers  Resolution.2 Passed  in the wake of the
Vietnam   War  as a check  on the President's Commander-in-Chief powers,
the War  Powers  Resolution  requires the President to report the commitment
of military forces to Congress  within  forty-eight hours of deployment.3  If
Congress,  within  sixty days, does  not (1) declare war;  (2) enact specific
authorization for the use of such  force; or (3) extend the sixty-day period,
the President shall terminate any use of United  States Armed  Forces.4
   According to McGovern and Meijer, their bill would reclaim
Congress's  constitutionally prescribed role in war powers disputes which, in
their view, has been  improperly   eroded by  a substantial expansion  of the
President's Commander-in-Chief powers.5 In the eyes of some scholars and
members of Congress, like McGovern and Meijer, the War Powers
Resolution  currently suffers from two major deficiencies: first, the President
can  easily circumvent  the Resolution's  sixty-day clock  by simply  ending



     J.D., 2022, University of Michigan Law School. The views reflected in this article are my own.
Thank you to the editors of the Journal ofLaw & Politics for selecting this piece and for their hard work
getting it to print. All errors are my own. I wrote the first draft of this note for Professor Stephen Cowen's
National Security Law seminar at the University of Michigan Law School. My thanks to Professor Cowen
for getting me to think about these issues and for his helpful suggestions. Thanks also to Max Ridge for
reading and commenting on earlier drafts. Finally, thank you to my parents who have constantly
supported me.
   1 National Security Reforms and Accountability Act, H.R. 5410, 117th Cong. (2021) [hereinafter
NSRAA]. The bill is currently in committee. Similar legislation has also been proposed in the Senate
but without any judicial enforcement provisions. See National Security Powers Act of 2021, S. 2391,
117th Cong. (2021).
   2 War Powers Resolution, 50 U.S.C. §§ 1541-48 (1973).
   ' Id. at § 1544(a)-(b).
   4Id. at § 1544(b). Section 1544(b) also waives the Resolution's termination provisions if Congress
is physically unable to meet as a result of an armed attack upon the United States. Id.
   5 Connor O'Brien, Lawmakers Aim for Blockbuster Overhaul of War Powers, Arms Sale, POLITICO
(Sept. 30, 2021), https://www.politico.com/news/2021/09/30/war-powers-act-bipartisan-overhaul-
514794; see also Harold Hongju Koh, Why the President (Almost) Always Wins in Foreign Affairs:
Lessons of the Iran-Contra Affair, 97 YALE L.J. 1255, 1297 (1988).
                                      1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most