- HeinOnline.org Skip to main content
Content Start

Click here to view short-term subscription options to access this document.

7 J. L. Econ. & Org. 24 (1991)
Multitask Principal-Agent Analyses: Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership, and Job Design

handle is hein.journals/jleo7 and id is 464 raw text is: 24 JLEO, V7 Sp

Multitask Principal-Agent Analyses: Incentive
Contracts, Asset Ownership, and Job Design
Bengt Holmstrom
Yale University
Paul Milgrom
Stanford University
1. Introduction
In the standard economic treatment of the principal-agent problem, compen-
sation systems serve the dual function of allocating risks and rewarding pro-
ductive work. A tension between these two functions arises when the agent is
risk averse, for providing the agent with effective work incentives often forces
him to bear unwanted risk. Existing formal models that have analyzed this
tension, however, have produced only limited results. 1 It remains a puzzle for
this theory that employment contracts so often specify fixed wages and more
generally that incentives within firms appear to be so muted, especially com-
pared to those of the market. Also, the models have remained too intractable
to effectively address broader organizational issues such as asset ownership,
job design, and allocation of authority.
In this article, we will analyze a principal-agent model that (i) can account
for paying fixed wages even when good, objective output measures are avail-
able and agents are highly responsive to incentive pay; (ii) can make recom-
mendations and predictions about ownership patterns even when contracts can
take full account of all observable variables and court enforcement is perfect;
(iii) can explain why employment is sometimes superior to independent con-
We are grateful to the National Science Foundation for financial support and to Gary Becker,
James Brickley, Murray Brown, Joel Demski, Joseph Farrell, Oliver Hart, David Kreps, Kevin
Murphy, Eric Rasmussen, Steve Ross, Steve Stem, and especially Avner Greif, Jane Hannaway,
and Hal Varian for their many insightful comments, examples, and suggestions. We also wish to
thank Froystein Gjesdal for pointing out two errors in an earlier draft.
1. Some of the predictive weaknesses of standard agency models are discussed in the surveys
by MacDonald, Hart and Holmstrom, and Baker, Jensen, and Murphy.
© 1991 by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. ISSN 8756-6222

Already a Subscriber?

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is the world’s largest image-based and fully searchable legal and academic research database. Material contained in HeinOnline is an exact replication of the original printed product, and coverage is typically comprehensive. Contact us today for a free demo of this incredible resource.

We offer annual subscriptions to all HeinOnline collections to universities, colleges, law firms, individuals, and other institutions. To request a quote or trial, please click here.

Please note: the content in the Law Journal Library is constantly changing and some content has restrictions as required per the license. Therefore, please review the available content via the following link to ensure the material you wish to access is included in the database. For a complete list of content included in the Law Journal Library, please click here.

Learn More About the Law Journal Library (pdf)
Back To Top Jump To Bottom