About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

20 J. Legis. 19 (1994)
The Role of Ammunition in a Balanced Program of Gun Control: A Critique of Moynihan Bullet Bills

handle is hein.journals/jleg20 and id is 27 raw text is: THE ROLE OF AMMUNITION IN A BALANCED
PROGRAM OF GUN CONTROL: A CRITIQUE OF
THE MOYNIHAN BULLET BILLS
Scott D. Dailard*
I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
Guns don't kill people-bullets do.1
This tired old line plucked from the repertoire of comedian, Pat Paulsen, has
been reborn as the guiding principle of an innovative gun control strategy proposed by
New York's senior senator, Daniel Patrick Moynihan.2 A series of bills introduced by
Moynihan to the 103d Congress propose to stall America's urban arms race and reduce
levels of violent crime by regulating the manufacture and sale of certain classes of
handgun ammunition.
Moynihan's proposed legislation emerges as an unexpected stepchild of sixty-five
years of federal gun control legislation. Since the birth of national firearms policy in
1934, Congress has neither adopted nor proposed any primary gun control strategy
based on the regulation of ammunition. Instead, the great American gun control debate
has always hinged on the dual axes of the bad gun and the bad user. From one
end of the political spectrum, the gun control lobby decries the proliferation of fire-
arms in society and calls for legislation banning private ownership of an expanding list
of weapons. From the opposite extreme, a powerful gun lobby steadfastly resists any
proposal to restrict the availability of guns, while pinning the blame for gun-related
violence on a justice system too soft on the criminal misuse of firearms.
The middle ground is occupied by a largely ineffectual federal legislation of
compromise featuring mild ownership restrictions,3 milder dealer licensing require-
ments, and a selective weapons ban proscribing a few handgun imports and some
obscure if extravagantly dangerous gangland weapons that are no more a part of the
contemporary crime scene than Scarface Al Capone.4
* Scott Dailard is a lawyer and a journalist living in the San Francisco Bay area. Dailard is a
graduate of the Boalt Hall School of Law, University of California at Berkeley and Harvard College.
He is currently serving as a judicial law clerk to the Honorable Samuel Conti in the United States
District Court for the Northern District of California (San Francisco).
1. Christopher Simser, Biting the Bullet, NAT'L REv., March 13, 1987, at 30 (quoting comedian
Pat Paulsen).
2. If we are serious about reducing crime -  if we are concerned about children
killing children -  ammunition to these guns ought be banned. After all, guns don't kill
people; bullets do. 137 CONG. REc. S10,070 (daily ed. July 16, 1991) (statement of Sen.
Moynihan).
3. Gun Control Act of 1968, § 902, 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g)-(h) (1988).
4. The National Firearms Act of 1934 banned the civilian ownership of machine guns,
sawed-off shotguns, silencers and  other relatively rare firearms that had  acquired  repu-
tations as gangster weapons in the years preceding its passage. National Firearms Act of
1934, ch. 757, 48 Stat. 1236 (1934) (as amended in scattered sections of 26 U.S.C.). Restric-
tions on  importation  of certain foreign  handguns, military  surplus and  other firearms

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most