About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

9 JLL 1 (2020)

handle is hein.journals/jlangaw9 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                                                               International Journal of
                                                               LANGUAGE & LAW

                                                            Guilldn Nieto, J LL 9 (2020): 1-22







Defamation as a Language Crime

-A Sociopragmatic Approach to Defamation Cases

in  the  High Courts of Justice of Spain


Victoria Guillin Nieto*


Abstract
The investigation of language crimes is one of the expert areas of forensic linguistics as a fo-
rensic science that analyses language as evidence. This paper focuses on a particular type of
language crime: defamation. This is an offence perpetrated, primarily, with malicious lan-
guage-either  written language (libel), spoken language (slander), or technospeech (Gar-
field, 2011:17)-that involves social emotions and intentional false communication and harms
a person's dignity, prestige, and reputation in the social community. Since the 198os, linguists
have tried to shed light on defamation as a language crime from various linguistic theories
such as speech act theory, semantics, discourse analysis, and pragmatics, as shown in works by
Durant (1996:195-210), Hancher (1980: 245-256), Kniffka (2007:113-148), Shuy (2010) and Ti-
ersma (1987: 303-350). In this paper, we take a different path in suggesting a socio pragmatics-
based approach to the analysis of defamation, with special reference to impoliteness (Cul-
peper, 2011; Spencer-Oatey, 2005: 95-119). The questions we discuss are: (1) Is the theory of
impoliteness appropriate for evidencing actionable offence in cases involving defamation? (2)
How  do the High Courts of Justice of Spain appraise defamatory meaning? (3) Does conven-
tionalised formulaic impoliteness promote guilty verdicts? And (4) Does non-conventional-
ised impoliteness support acquittals?This piece of research is grounded in empirical data, par-
ticularly in a corpus of15o judgments for cases of defamation given bythe High Courts of Jus-
tice of Spain between 2013 and 2017.

Keywords
forensic linguistics, High Courts of Justice of Spain, impoliteness, language as evidence, Ian-
guage crimes

Submitted: 3 March 2019, accepted: 2April 2020, published online:9 April 2020




   * University of Alicante, toa.gu i as. The author would like to thank the editors and reviewers for
careful reading, thoughtful comments, and constructive suggestions for this article.

     International Journal of Language & Law vol. 9 (2020)                        1
     DOI   .

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most