About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

89 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 1393 (1998-1999)
Law and Police Practice: Restrictions in the Law of Interrogation and Confessions

handle is hein.journals/jclc89 and id is 1407 raw text is: 0091-4169/99/8904-1393 THE JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW & CRIMINOLOGY Vol. 89, No. 4 Copyright 0 1957 by Northwesten University, School of Law Pdnted in U.&A. LAW AND POLICE PRACTICE: RESTRICTIONS IN THE LAW OF INTERROGATION AND CONFESSIONS* FRED E. INBAU When the police handcuff a suspected criminal, they, as well as the arrested person himself, have a very definite understand- ing as to where he is going. The purpose of the handcuffing is also quite apparent. But when the courts handcuff the police- and it is suggested that some of them do-it is doubtful if they have a clear-cut notion as to where they are headed. It is also questionable whether such courts have given adequate consid- eration to other and perhaps better methods for coping with the police problems about which they are concerned. Artificial restrictions which the courts have imposed upon law enforcement agencies and officers are the result of two basic misconceptions regarding police misconduct. The first misconception concerns the role to be played by the courts with respect to the control or supervision of police activities. The theory has been developed by some judges that the judiciary is privileged to exert disciplinary control and su- pervision over the police. For this position constitutional authority seems to be completely lacking. Courts have the power, of course, to reject evidence illegally obtained, and par- ticularly so where the trustworthiness or validity of the evidence may be affected by the methods used to secure it. But that is a distinctly different matter from the control or supervision of po- lice activities themselves. Even within the federal system, there seems to be no constitutional authority for the exercise of any supervisory power by the Supreme Court over the activities of federal officers, although there is no doubt about the Supreme Court's supervisory power with respect to the lower federal courts and the evidence that may be admitted in the trial of federal cases. The fundamental concept of a threefold division Originally printed in 52 Nw. U. L. REV. 77 (1957). 1393

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most