About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

69 J.L. Pol'y & Globalization 26 (2018)
The Function of Pretrial Institution in the Decision of Limitation on the Duration of Investigation to Enforce Law in Indonesia according to the Perspective of Human Rights

handle is hein.journals/jawpglob69 and id is 27 raw text is: 


Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization                                                       www.o
ISSN 2224-3240 (Paper) ISSN 2224-3259 (Online)
Vol.69, 2018                                                                                         ISTE


  The Function of Pretrial Institution in the Decision of Limitation

    on   the   Duration of Investigation to Enforce Law in Indonesia

                According to the Perspective of Human Rights

                Anang S. Tornado'    I Nyoman  Nurjaya2   Prija Djatmika3   Noor Hafidah4
                1.Doctorate Candidate at The Faculty of Law, Brawijaya University, Indonesia
            2.Professor of Customary Law at The Faculty of Law, Brawijaya University, Indonesia
                      3.Lecturer at The Faculty of Law, Brawijaya University, Indonesia
               4.Lecturer at The Faculty of Law, Lambung Mangkurat University, Banjarmasin

Abstract
Indonesia as a country that embraced the system of due process model demands its citizens to put forward the
rights possessed by the suspect in the criminal proceedings process.In the process of examination before the trial
to the stage of prosecution is very vulnerable to violations. In order to provide protection against the enforcement
of the rights of the suspect, Criminal Procedure Code gave birth to Pretrial institutions. Pretrial prejudices in the
Criminal Procedure Code  are new and are used to protect the rights of suspects in the investigation process. Due
to the nature of Pretrial that put forward the knowledge of law, to protect the rights possessed by suspect, it
requires the role of legal counsel. However, not everyone can present legal counsel in the litigation process,due
to the high cost of services. Based on this issue, it can be said that Pretrial Institution in the criminal procedure
law is essentially not only to adjudicate in relation to the harmful actions of society, but also the arbitrariness of
government  apparatus, law enforcers, and others. Normatively there is no regulation regarding the time limit
(limitation) of investigation in Criminal Procedure Code, but only set the limit of detention's duration. While the
suspect's status will only cease or has been completed in the event of termination of the investigation by the
issuance of an Inquiry Letter on Termination or the file has been declared as complete and then submitted to the
prosecutor to be tried in court. This indefinite investigation resulted in uncertainty on the duration of a person
should bear the suspect's status, and causing harm to the suspect.
Keywords:  Due  Process Model, Suspect, Pretrial, Criminal, Investigation, Limitation.

A.  Introduction
In essence the quality of law enforcement can not be separated from the objective of improving the quality of
community   life and the quality of sustainable development (sustainable development/sustainable society).'
Pretrial is a new thing in the Indonesian judicial world. Pretrial is one of the new institutions introduced by the
Criminal Procedure  Code in the midst of law enforcement. The birth of Pretrial in KUHAP  is an adaptation
ofhabeas corpus institution of the Anglo-Saxon criminal justice system. However, the authority given to judges
in the judicial process is much more limited than the authority of commissioner judges in countries with civil law
                                                                                                        2
traditions in mainland Europe (rechter-commissari, juged'instruction, juez de intruci6n, juizintruglio, and so on).
The court provides benefits to the suspects from the arbitrariness of law enforcement officers in conducting the
investigation process. The protection of the rights of suspects can be defended in the pretrial process, so that the
process runs  more  transparently and does not harm  any  parties,even more the suspect. However,  in the
implementation there are still some weaknesses both in its formulation and in its application in the court, so that
there is no human rights protection for the suspect. Related to the determination of suspect in Indonesia still have
problems  such as about the time limit or limitation of duration to someone. A person under the provisions of
Article 109 paragraph (2) of the new Criminal Procedure Code can only cease to have his status as a suspect if
his case is terminated. The absence of limitation related to the status of suspect, is a loss to a person who has
been designated as a suspect.The status of suspect (without deadline) one of which can be seen from the case
handled  by  KPK   (KomisiPemberantasanKorupsi / Commission of Corruption Eradication)on the arrest
ofAndiZulkarnaenMallarangeng   aka ChoelMallarangeng   as suspected alleged corruption on the construction
project of National Training, Education, and Sports School Center, in Hambalang, West Java, fiscal year 2010-
2012. The  KPK  named  Cloel as a suspect on December  16, 2015 and was detained at KPK's detention house
branchPomdam Jaya Guntur for the following 20 days until 25 February 2017. The status of suspect
onChoelMallarangeng  due to alleged corruption on the construction project of National Training, Education, and
Sports School Centeris one of the weaknesses  of Indonesian criminal law system. It has been more than 22
months  since ChoelMallarangeng did not receive legal certainty. As explained, ChoelMallarangeng has the rights

'Barda Nawawi Arief, Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana, Cet, 3, (Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti 2013), pg. 249.
2Andi Hamzah dan RM Surachman,Pre-Trial Justice Discretionary Justice dalam KUHAP Berbagai Negara, (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2015),
pg. 106.
3http: www. Covesia.com. terkatung-katung selama lima tahun, akhirnya Choel Mallarangeng Ditahan KPK. Accessed on 29 May 2017.


26

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most