About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

125 J.L. Pol'y & Globalization 1 (2022)

handle is hein.journals/jawpglob125 and id is 1 raw text is: Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization                                                 www.iistc -1
ISSN 2224-3240 (Paper) ISSN 2224-3259 (Online)
Vol. 125, 2022                                                                                 IISTE
A Reflection on Security Agents' Human Rights Violations in the
Enforcement of Covid-19 Measures
Chrispin Mwinkyogtaa Kuupiel * Peter Claver Sutinga2
1. Centre for Conflict, Human Rights and Peace Studies, University of Education, Winneba,
P. O. Box 25, Central Region, Ghana
2. Organizational Development, Department of Business and Economics, Atlantic International University,
Pioneer Plaza, 900 Fort Street Mall #905, Honolulu, HI 96813
* E-mail of the corresponding author: chrispinkuupiel@gmail.com
Abstract
This paper reflects on security agents' response efforts throughout the Covid-19 period across the world. The
aim of the paper is to draw the human rights excesses perpetrated by security forces across the world to stimulate
rethinking of States' security, securitization, and policing policies as well as strategies in times of emergencies
and pandemics. Data informing the discussion in the paper were drawn from secondary sources such as journal
articles and online news portals. The discussion shows that various regimes of securitization characterized the
pandemic period. The contention of the paper is that the enforcement of Covid-19 restrictions by security forces
in some countries resulted in violations of several human rights. The way the enforcement of the pandemic
measures was carried out impaired people's rights and their dignity. Hence, trauma may be one of the major
challenging issues to deal with in the post-Covid-19 era. The paper contributes to the understanding of the
interaction between security and human rights.
Keywords: Security Agents, Human Rights, Violation, Covid-19, Enforcement
DOI: 10.7176/JLPG/125-01
Publication date:October 31st 2022
Introduction
This paper is an opinion piece. The paper highlights the violation of some basic human rights standards by
security agents in some countries in their efforts to enforce the Covid-19 pandemic measures. The Covid-19
virus which broke out in the Wuhan city of China, spread throughout the world resulting in millions of deaths.
The pandemic has changed the world and all spheres of life (Sutinga & Nangwele, 2022) and proven how
interconnected the world has become. The virus has also revealed that whatever one's race, gender, status, etc.,
everyone remains vulnerable. The consequences of Covid-19 have been very dire.
Economies crashed, businesses collapsed, people lost their jobs (Jackson et al., 2020 Ozili & Arun, 2020),
religious activities have been seriously impacted (Sutinga & Nangwele, 2022; Kowalczyk, et al., 2020; Pillay,
2020; Sulkowski & Ignatowski, 2020; Yasin, et al., 2020; Shibambu & Egunjobi, 2020), human lives have been
loss (WHO, 2020), and livelihoods have been threatened. Fear, panic, suspicion, mistrust, and apprehension
grew among populations, and many countries became more vulnerable to security breaches.
Governments and States across the world responded to the spread of the virus through several restrictive
measures, including lockdowns, quarantines, stay-at-home orders, social distancing directives, closing of borders,
inter alia. To ensure the effectiveness of these covid-19 restrictive measures, governments deployed security
agents to enforce the measures. Meanwhile, it is argued that our ability to fight and conquer the virus and recover
from it is dependent on our respect for human rights (OHCHR, 2020) and fundamental freedoms. Response
efforts need to be legal, proportionate, strictly necessary, driven by scientific evidence, not arbitrary or
nondiscriminatory, respectful of human dignity, as well as subject to review, and tailored to achieve the
pandemic objective (UNAIDS, 2020; UN, 2020; Human Rights Watch, 2020).
Thus, the questions to be asked include: Were security agents' response efforts during the pandemic period
legal, proportionate, non arbitrary or discriminatory, driven by scientific evidence and meant to achieve the
pandemic objective? Did security agents' response efforts respect human rights? We need human rights to fight
and overcome the pandemic. Their observance - providing people with good food, water and shelter; accessible
and affordable healthcare; timely, accurate and accessible information; and respecting people's dignity, is not
only important but also necessary if we want to overcome the virus and to come out from it successfully,
stronger and prepared for the future.
The United Nations indicated that response efforts that are shaped or informed by human rights put people
at the center and yields better outcomes and that in this pandemic period, every human right matters and is
needed to navigate the crisis (UN, 2020, p. 2). This paper believes that the promotion or protection of people's
health unfolds from and enfolds in the respect, promotion and protection of human rights. The promotion of
people's health and human rights are mutually reinforcing and supportive of each other. The observance of
human rights is the promotion of the health of people and the promotion of people's health is the observance of

1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most