![handle is hein.journals/intjsemi34 and id is 1 raw text is: Int J Semiot Law (2021) 34:1-5
https://doi.org/1 0.1007/s11196-020-09785-8
Law, Popular Culture and the Arts in the 21st Century
Peter Robson' Sarah Marusek2
Accepted: 28 August 2020 / Published online: 16 October 2020
© Springer Nature B.V. 2020
1 Introduction
Scholarly engagement with the interface between the formal justice system and pop-
ular culture has been relatively recent and has developed a tendency to focus on film.
In the Bibliography of one of the early collections on Law and Film [1], the editors
identified some 76 essays and books between 1986 and 2000. The first appeared
in 1986 [2]. A broad expansive examination of popular culture was found in the
1992 meeting of American legal scholars [3]. This burgeoning movement examined
film, television, light opera, women's studies and literature. Its approach has gener-
ally not been continued [4]. Rather we have, on the one hand, works in distinctive
fields focusing on single phenomena like film [5] or television [6, 7]. Some areas
have received scant attention [8]. In addition, there have been collections centring on
a broad theme such as visual studies [9], cultural legal studies [10] or legal language
[11]. The vast majority of the scholarship has been from a cultural studies viewpoint
with elements of social scientific analysis also encountered. Here we seek to reflect
what we see as the worthwhile goal of crossing between these boundaries and bring-
ing together work from the distinct traditions of literary criticism, social science and
semiotics.
Traditionally, semiotics has focused on visual representations of meaning [12].
Yet even the understanding of the visual has evolved from the static to the motile.
Furthermore, the visual is no longer relegated to the framework of sighted, but
instead the experience of seeing in media is synaesthetically expanded as a semi-
otic system [14] through the audible and the sensory [15]. The semiotics of law and
popular culture embody a command of visual meaning that envisages the ordering
of power through more than just the eyes, as the papers in this Special Issue show
[13, 16, 17].
E Sarah Marusek
marusek@hawaii.edu
Peter Robson
peter.robson@strath.ac.uk
Glasgow, Scotland
2 Hilo, HI, USA
I_) Springer](ViewImageLocal?handle=hein.journals/intjsemi34&div=1&collection=&method=preview&ext=.png&size=3)
What Is HeinOnline?
Contact us for annual subscription options:
Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?
profiles profiles most
Contact us for annual subscription options:
Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?
profiles profiles most
Contact us for annual subscription options:
Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?
profiles profiles most