About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

31 Int'l J. Refugee L. 1 (2019)

handle is hein.journals/intjrl31 and id is 1 raw text is: 




International Journal of Refugee Law, 2019, Vol 31, No 1, 1-29
doi:10.1093/ijrl/eez01S


                               ARTICLES



                       Excluding Women

              Catherine Dauvergne* and Hannah Lindyt


                                   ABSTRACT

   This article reviews 16 years of Canadian case law applying the Refugee Convention's
   exclusion provisions to women. Despite a quarter of a century of strong scholarly and
   policy-making work asserting the need for attention to gender in refugee law, this dataset
   shows that, in questions of exclusion, gendered analysis is almost entirely absent. By con-
   trast, in seeking explanations for the factual basis of exclusion in these cases, gender is
   almost always an explanatory factor. This stark observation leads us to conclude that sig-
   nificant additional work - both scholarly and policy-focused - is required. The article also
   considers whether a more robust application of existing Supreme Court jurisprudence
   can address the problems we have identified and reaches a mixed conclusion. Overall, the
   article points out an important gap in current understandings of gender in refugee law,
   and maps a way forward for future work in the area.

                             1.  INTRODUCTION

This article looks at Canadian case law excluding women from refugee protection. Its
empirical core is a group of cases from the past two decades where the argument was
raised, often successfully, that a woman ought not to be considered a refugee because of
a criminal or otherwise heinous act. Our objective in this analysis is to bring together
insights about the place of gender in refugee law with recent work on the jurisprudence
of exclusion. The results are nothing short of bizarre.
   In the contemporary political context, the rules surrounding refugee exclusions have
become  a focus ofintense interest. The idea that some people simply do not deserve refugee
protection has slipped into popular discourse, repeated regularly in news broadcasts con-
cerning the flood ofhumanity making its way to Europe's southern shores and the array of
national leaders erecting walls in one form or another. The political importance of refugee
exclusions began even before the Arab  Spring, which altered the landscape of global
refugee movements   in the second decade of this century. Indeed, following the 9/11
attacks in the United States (US) in 2001, the idea that refugee populations were a likely
camouflage for terrorists quickly became alarmingly popular. The uptick in refugee flows

*   Allard School of Law, University of British Columbia, Canada.
+   Barrister and solicitor, Waldman and Associates, Toronto, Canada.

© The Author(s) (2019). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
For Permissions please email: journals.permissionspoup.com

                                                                              .   1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most