About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

34 Yale L. & Pol'y Rev. Inter Alia 1 (2015-2016)

handle is hein.journals/interal34 and id is 1 raw text is: 







              YALE LAW & POLICY REVIEW




                   Discrimination as Disruption:
                Addressing Hostile Environments
                Without   Violating   the  Constitution

                             Cara McClellan*
    In early March 2015, a video surfaced showing members of the Sigma Alpha
Epsilon (SAE) fraternity at the University of Oklahoma chanting: There will
never be a nigger at SAE ... you can hang him from a tree, but he'll never sign
with me. Following the wide circulation of this video, the university's president
expelled two students leading the chants in the video for creating a hostile racial
environment  on campus. Legal commentators criticized this disciplinary action,
arguing that it violated the First Amendment and principles of academic free-
dom.' On  the other hand, a review of Title VI law suggests that President David
Boren's actions were in line with federal regulations. This has led some to argue
that universities are in a double bind.2 They are required by civil rights stat-
utes to redress hostile environments, but face liability under the First Amend-
ment  if they punish speech that led to a hostile environment. This essay argues
that a university can defend punishment of hostile environment conduct based
upon  its authority to punish students for substantially disrupting the operations
of the university-balancing free speech rights with the rights of students to at-
tend school free from racial discrimination.

I.  HOSTILE  ENVIRONMENT   REGULATION  CANNOT  BE OVERLY  BROAD

    When   students are punished for their verbal statements or other forms of
expression, consideration must be given to First Amendment implications.3 In-

*    Yale Law School, J.D. 2015. The author expresses her sincere appreciation to
     Professor Reva Siegel and Dean Robert Post for their guidance and advice.
1.   See, e.g., Geoffrey R. Stone, Racist Rants and the University of Oklahoma: Getting It
     Wrong, HUFF. POST POL. (Mar. 11, 2015), http://www.huffingtonpost.com/geoffrey -
     r- stone/racist-rants- and-the-univb_6 844500.html.
2.   Judith Shulevitz, In College and Hiding From Scary Ideas, N.Y. TIMES, Mar. 21, 2015,
     http://www.nytimes.com/2o15/o3/22/opinion/sunday/judith-shulevitz-hiding-
     from-scary-ideas.html?emc= etai.
3.   Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School Dist, 393 U.S. 503 (1969).

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most